Singapore must consider Asean interests in its US-China calculations: Sinologist Wang Gungwu
- A new collection of lectures by Wang explores how Southeast Asia’s local and national cultures have impacted each state’s response to global powers
- In this excerpt, Wang examines how Singapore’s US-China balancing act is critical to regional peace
![Professor Wang Gungwu. Photo: SCMP](https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1020x680/public/d8/images/canvas/2023/12/06/a0a911e6-228f-4b15-b0a3-a1123bc3c185_fc163394.jpg?itok=4Us_qiGb&v=1701845696)
In Living With Civilisations, a recently published collection of four IPS-Nathan Lectures by Singapore-based professor Wang Gungwu, he explores the civilisations that shaped the history and nation-building process of Southeast Asian states. The following excerpt is from the prominent China historian’s fourth lecture, on Chinese-majority Singapore’s “exceptional conundrum” in balancing its ties with the United States and China.
With this shield, the island-state was enabled to nation-build with a plural society that drew from several living civilisations. From a unique combination of policies and practices, the new state laid the foundations of a first-world nation at the heart of Southeast Asia.
Everyone was conscious that three-quarters of Singapore’s population was of Chinese origin. That had always been a source of unease in the region. Furthermore, no one foresaw the swift rise of China and its turn towards a state-centred capitalism that provided it with the economic power to make it appear as a threat to the United States.
![Former Singapore prime minister Goh Chok Tong (left) and Chinese Premier Li Peng toast each other during an event in Beijing in April 1997. File photo: AP Former Singapore prime minister Goh Chok Tong (left) and Chinese Premier Li Peng toast each other during an event in Beijing in April 1997. File photo: AP](https://img.i-scmp.com/cdn-cgi/image/fit=contain,width=1024,format=auto/sites/default/files/d8/images/canvas/2023/12/06/47aaff09-0e9f-4037-92f0-dce1e724f028_08b2778f.jpg)
Nobody anticipated that the severely weakened Sinic civilisation could have used its two revolutions to achieve modernisation so quickly. It now claimed to be the successor to a continuous Sinic centralised state. When China also claimed to have drawn inspiration from the same Enlightenment roots as the West, the US began to demonise the Communist Party-led party-state as returning to the ideology previously represented by the Soviet Union. This ignores China’s deep roots in a civilisation that had considered itself central and exceptional for millennia.
![loading](https://assets-v2.i-scmp.com/production/_next/static/media/wheel-on-gray.af4a55f9.gif)