Will Hong Kong join Singapore, Malaysia in ditching foreign judges after British law lords’ exit?
- Foreign judges have long provided an authoritative backstop to Hong Kong’s judiciary, but their relevance has waned in the 25 years since the handover
- One analyst said it was now a question of ‘when, rather than whether’ the city follows other former British colonies in removing foreign judicial influence
In his departing statement, Supreme Court president Robert Reed said he and his deputy Patrick Hodge “cannot continue to sit in Hong Kong without appearing to endorse an administration which has departed from values of political freedom, and freedom of expression”.
“The situation has reached a tipping point where it is no longer tenable for British judges to sit on Hong Kong’s leading court, and would risk legitimising oppression,” Britain’s Foreign Secretary Liz Truss said later, adding: “We have seen a systematic erosion of liberty and democracy in Hong Kong.”
The justices’ exit – described by Hong Kong officials as politically driven – shrank the pool of British judges on the Court of Final Appeal to six, ostensibly posing a threat to the city’s reputation for having an independent judiciary.
At the same time, it called into question the role foreign judges play in the city and whether they were still needed, given the judiciary’s advances in the 25 years since the end of colonial rule.