Asian Angle | Why Hong Kong’s ‘political taboos’ shouldn’t hinder an independent pandemic inquiry
- While Singapore has released a white paper reviewing its response to the Covid-19 pandemic, Hong Kong authorities have been reluctant to follow suit
- Donald Low argues that a ‘truly independent inquiry’ would raise uncomfortable questions that challenge Hong Kong leaders’ claims of competence and objectivity during the course of the pandemic
Presented as an exercise in highlighting the key lessons from the pandemic so that the country can be more resilient for the next one, the white paper is evidence of the Singapore government’s capacity for forward thinking and preparation, learning from mistakes, and sound policymaking.
At the same time, one can understand the Hong Kong government’s reticence to embark on such an exercise if one recognises three uncomfortable truths about Hong Kong’s handling of the pandemic.
Lagging in Asia
Singapore’s white paper makes the self-evident point that relative to other countries, the city state has done well in protecting lives and livelihoods – in balancing the trade-off between public health and the economy. What should be equally obvious is that Hong Kong’s performance, on both public health and economic performance indicators, was abysmal relative to other developed Asian economies, and worse than even some developing ones. Table 1 summarises this uncomfortable truth.