As I see it | Hong Kong should take a leaf from Singapore’s alternative to live-in rule for domestic workers
- A Singapore scheme that allows some helpers to be hired by companies instead of household employers offers these workers greater flexibility and labour rights
- Hong Kong should model such an approach. Instead of forcing domestic workers to live with their bosses, both parties should be able to reach an agreement that suits them best
Under the programme, which was launched about five years ago but only became permanent in September, women from Myanmar, Sri Lanka, India, Thailand and Cambodia are hired and housed by companies. These firms then assign part-time duties in different households, including cleaning.
Women previously interviewed by This Week in Asia said the scheme meant better pay, more regular working hours, enhanced labour rights, and increased freedom. The programme, however, is far from perfect and does not allow workers to change jobs or look after children and the elderly.
Hong Kong should look into this example and take it further. Advocates have long supported the idea of allowing migrant workers and employers to choose an arrangement that works the best for both parties, instead of having to comply with a mandatory live-in rule.
