Advertisement

Abacus | One country, two systems isn’t working. Time for a Hong Kong governor

  • The governance experiment was introduced a quarter of a century ago with the best of intentions, but it has ultimately failed
  • Rather than playing the blame game, isn’t it time to try a different management approach?

Reading Time:5 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
74
Chinese leader Jiang Zemin shakes hands with Britain’s Prince Charles during the Hong Kong handover ceremony on June 30, 1997. Photo: Robert Ng

THE FIFTY-YEAR TRANSITION

Advertisement
The fifty-year period of “one country, two systems” following the handover of Hong Kong in 1997 was formulated to ease the city’s transition to a politically, financially and culturally different mainland China by 2047, principally by allowing Hong Kong to maintain its capitalist system.
Until around 2013, it seemed to have worked fairly well as the People’s Liberation Army never appeared on the streets of Central and Kowloon with cattle prods as some had feared, prosperity in mainland China was on the way up, Hong Kong tourism was booming, and the Olympics drew international visitors to the region with Hong Kong as a stop-off and much money was sloshing around. Contrary to the worst fears of the city’s residents in 1997, Hong Kong was doing very well.

Then cracks started to appear. Unhappiness with the direction in which the city was headed combined with lack of progress on socioeconomic issues such as housing, rising costs of living, erosion of standards of living, lack of free speech and rising wealth inequality. The result was unrest and a government crackdown on those showing their discontent.

Today, Hong Kong’s remaining large-scale businesses, finance and property are feeling the knock-on effects and have been put under severe stress. The city has the worst-performing stock market among developed economies, commercial property is suffering, and its people and their businesses are leaving.
Advertisement

In recent years, as every resident and international observer knows, Hong Kong has not been a happy place. And I now wonder if the original governance agreement that was devised in the early 1980s of “one country, two systems” is at fault and whether it should be considered a failed experiment. Perhaps it is time for a rethink, especially in light of how China has changed since 1997 when its economic prowess and love of capitalism had barely been seen.

Advertisement