bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

articlePageQuery

filter

article

articleBaseAdvertisingInfoArticle

articleListArticle

articleSeoArticle

helpersCheckIsPostiesArticle

hooksArticleAcknowledgementGateOverlayArticle

hooksTrackPageViewArticle

hooksContentInterestArticle

articleLinkingDataContent

articleSchemaContent

liveArticle

advertZone

sentiment

contentLock

topics

types

sections

moreOnThisArticles

urlAlias

commentCount

sponsorType

authorLocations

authors

paywallTypes

corrections

displaySlideShow

multimediaEmbed

printHeadline

seriesContainer

socialHeadline

headline

flag

firstTopic

glossary

flattenTypeIds

publishedDate

additionalInfoBoxes

images

image

relatedLinks

relatedNewsletters

__typename

createdDate

sponsor

factSheets

series

disableOffPlatformContent

published

updatedDate

summary

subHeadline

body

keywords

copyrighted

customTimezone

liveContents

Tom Holland

Think of the smartphone in your pocket. Now compare it with the mobile phone you might have carried 20, or even 30, years ago.
They are hardly comparable. They are different sizes, different shapes, and worlds apart in what they can do.
That brick from 20 years ago could make telephone calls and send short text messages – if you were lucky enough to have cellular coverage.
With today’s smartphones you can not only watch movies, you can make them. They can monitor your health and fitness, tell you where you are going, and even find you love. About the only thing they have in common with the mobiles of the 1990s is that you could use both to make telephone calls.

Now think of the typical car on the road today, and compare it with one from 20 or 30 years ago. They look the same, and they do the same thing in the same way.
Sure, both petrol and diesel engines have become more efficient, and today’s cars have far more electric gadgetry. But these are changes of degree, not of kind.
In all important respects, the cars of today are much the same as those of the late 1990s, or even the late 1980s.
Ending Indian poverty makes sense economically, just not politically
But it’s a sure bet that given the pace of technological development and the speed that consumers’ expectations are changing, the car of 2039 will resemble those of today as little as a mobile phone from 2019 resembles one from 1999.
That’s a big problem for the global automotive industry. Quite simply, car companies have failed to move with the times, and now they are getting left behind.

This failure is being reflected in falling sales. In the second half of 2018, global sales of cars and pickup trucks fell 5 per cent compared with the same period the previous year, with sales down steeply in China and the European Union, and only just in positive territory in the United States.
Most industry analysts attribute this downturn in sales to one-off idiosyncratic factors, and to cyclical headwinds that will soon blow over.
In China, for example, buyers rushed to make purchases in late 2017, ahead of the expiry of generous tax breaks at the end of the year. As a result, with so many purchases brought forward, sales slumped in 2018, with sales of passenger cars falling 4 per cent – the first decline in nearly 30 years.
Similarly, in Europe car buyers rushed to take advantage of cut-price deals ahead of the introduction in late 2018 of new emission test standards. Following the cut-off, sales fell.

Meanwhile in the US, rising interest rates have made buying cars on credit more expensive.
It’s true that all these factors have been at work. But to concentrate on the short-term headwinds is to play down the three major related challenges facing the global automotive industry: technology, the environment and politics.
The most immediate of these challenges is political. In the coming days, the US administration will go ahead and decide whether or not to impose punitive Section 232 tariffs on imports of cars on “national security” grounds. If it goes ahead, European and, to a lesser extent, Japanese and Korean, carmakers will be hit hard.
Sorry guys, even in China, there’s no magic money tree
They will be forced to absorb the additional cost, which means their margins will suffer, or they will pass the cost on to customers, which means their sales volumes will suffer. Either way, profits, and therefore future investment, will be hurt.

Some of that pain could be alleviated by currency movements. But the longer-term challenges facing the car industry will be more difficult to dodge.
The most obvious of these is environmental. At 140 years old, the internal combustion engine has had a good run. But with politicians vowing to ban polluting vehicles from the streets of European cities by 2040, few would bet that cars powered by petrol and diesel have much of a future.
Retooling for this new age involves enormous risk for car companies. It means rejecting the technology that made their reputations and fortunes, and it means betting tens of billions of US dollars on untried new engineering. Worse, there is doubt about which emerging technology will prevail. In a battle that has been likened to the VHS versus Betamax video-standard struggle of the late 1970s and early 1980s, carmakers are unsure whether battery-powered or hydrogen fuel cell cars will be the ones to achieve critical momentum in future.

So far the betting is on battery-powered cars, encouraged in part by government policies. But governments can do more harm than good. For example, in China government subsidies and quotas for electric vehicles have led to the emergence of scores of producers turning out substandard and inefficient electric vehicles in order to extract rents from the government, rather than to produce commercially viable non-polluting cars.
Finally, there is the worry that by manufacturing cars for sale to buying customers, today’s auto companies have completely missed the bus as far as meeting consumer expectations of new technologies is concerned.
The truth about China’s surplus? There isn’t one
In a nutshell, car companies are run by old-fashioned engineers who are lousy at dealing with new tech. That much shows up in the inefficient, piecemeal way they have adopted new software technologies. According to management consultancy McKinsey, the typical new car runs on 100 million lines of software code. That compares with a Boeing 787 airliner, which runs on fewer than 10 million, or the US F-35 warplane, described by one aviation analyst as “a communications platform of astounding sophistication” which runs on around 25 million.

This focus on old engineering, development by accretion, and sales of physical kit to customers has served the club of global automotive giants well enough in the past. But it is not going to succeed in a future in which the users of Uber and other ride-hailing apps are increasingly questioning the very idea of individual car ownership.
Add to that the promise of self-driving technologies, and it begins to seem clear that the automotive companies of the future will not make their profits by building and selling private cars to individual buyers, but by providing personalised transport services to their subscribers. Viewed through that lens, the car giants of today look singularly ill-equipped to survive. Think Nokia. ■
Tom Holland is a former SCMP staffer who has been writing about Asian affairs for more than 25 years


China’s EV market lures new entrants with eyes on BYD’s crown – at great peril

China’s 10 millionth EV rolls out, as makers set sights on exports to digest overcapacity

Chinese EV makers’ go-global drive hits bumps amid Beijing’s  warning, failed deals

Xiaomi CEO Lei Jun marks roll-out of 100,000th EV by paying homage to Tesla’s Elon Musk

Automotive industry

Global car giants are the Nokia of today, rolling towards commercial extinction

A Lutzmann vintage car made in 1896 makes its way down Whitehall  during a re-enactment of the first London to Brighton rally. This Lutzmann is believed to have taken part in the very first rally one hundred years ago. Photo: Reuters

A Hyundai Motor's electric car IONIQ is charged at a electric charging station in Seoul, South Korea, December 11, 2018. Picture taken December 11, 2018. REUTERS/Kim Hong-Ji

TOK04-19970919-TOKYO, JAPAN: Tsutomu Sawada, vice president of the number-two Japanese car maker Nissan Motor Co. Ltd., shows his new engine "NEO Di" which incorporates a system for injecting fuel directly into the combustion chamber in Tokyo 18 September. Nissan is the third Japanese car maker to adopt the so-called direct-injection engine, designed to improve fuel economy and power output after Mitsubishi Motor Corp. and Toyota Motor Corp. AFP PHOTO AFP PHOTO AFP/TORU YAMANAKA/ty/ky

Photo: EPA

Visitors look at the EVE concept car from Chinese startup NIO during the Auto Shanghai 2017 show at the National Exhibition and Convention Center in Shanghai, China, Wednesday, April 19, 2017. Models on display at Auto Shanghai 2017, the global industry's biggest marketing event of the year, reflect the conflict between Beijing's ambitions to promote environmentally friendly propulsion and Chinese consumers' love of hulking, fuel-hungry SUVs. (AP Photo/Ng Han Guan)

Mexico's presidential jet, a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner.

This handout image show mobile phone Nokia 8310. Photo / HANDOUT [19MAY2016 FEATURES ONLINE]

Business

Opinion

Comment

World

Asia

News

Europe

This Week in Asia

Economics


At 140 years old, the internal combustion engine has had a good run and modern car companies are ill prepared for the next technological innovation



Future tech

Nokia

Electric & new energy vehicles

Self-driving cars and autonomous vehicles

Expresses the views, ideas and conclusions of the author. (Eg. Enough of Crazy Rich Asians, think of crazy poor Hongkongers.)


Column

Abacus

Abacus | Global car giants are the Nokia of today, rolling towards commercial extinction

At 140 years old, the internal combustion engine has had a good run and modern car companies are ill prepared for the next technological innovation