Letters | HKEX worked through No 8 typhoon signal. So should rest of Hong Kong
Readers discuss the need to overhaul a typhoon signal system last revised in 1973, forging partnerships for Hong Kong’s industrial modernisation, the application of the rule of law in Hong Kong and football violence in Amsterdam
Feel strongly about these letters, or any other aspects of the news? Share your views by emailing us your Letter to the Editor at [email protected] or filling in this Google form. Submissions should not exceed 400 words, and must include your full name and address, plus a phone number for verification
I urge the government and the Legislative Council to extend these remote working arrangements across all sectors. Not only will this move boost the productivity of our city’s workforce, it could safeguard millions of residents from the hazards of commuting in severe weather after the signal is lowered.
The Education Bureau should also establish clear guidelines for schools to seamlessly transition to online learning during typhoon disruptions. This will ensure our students’ education continues without interruption, maintaining academic progress and consistency.
Simon Wang, Kowloon Tong
Time to tap technology to minimise typhoon disruption
Hong Kong’s typhoon signal system has not had a major overhaul since 1973. Since then we have had major advancements in satellites, computing and communications. Typhoon 8 signals disrupt millions of people and cause us significant economic impact, including families and business owners.