Advertisement
Advertisement
Education in Hong Kong
Get more with myNEWS
A personalised news feed of stories that matter to you
Learn more
Students arrive for the DSE English exam at a school in North Point in 2023. Senior secondary students have been able to take business and marketing-related English courses as electives under the auspices of the Education Bureau. Photo: Dickson Lee

Letters | Rethink Hong Kong institutions’ English programmes for the digital age

  • Readers discuss a burgeoning market for practical English courses, the waste of staff time that is a meeting, and the low priority given to language in Hong Kong
Feel strongly about these letters, or any other aspects of the news? Share your views by emailing us your Letter to the Editor at [email protected] or filling in this Google form. Submissions should not exceed 400 words, and must include your full name and address, plus a phone number for verification

Given Hong Kong’s status as an international business hub and the high demand for English proficiency across various sectors, both government-funded and self-funded tertiary institutions in the city have long offered English programmes.

However, a steady decline in student enrolment for traditional English programmes at several self-funded institutions has contributed to the phase-out of such courses.

Instead, recent years have seen a burgeoning market for alternative English courses at these institutions, such as those offered by the School of Continuing and Professional Education at City University. Of particular interest are the business and marketing-related English courses that senior secondary students can take as electives at these institutions under the auspices of the Education Bureau.

Judging from a focus group interview I conducted with 15 senior secondary students, it appears that the primary distinctions between these new English courses and the traditional English degree programmes are content and duration.

The new courses tend to be shorter and place great emphasis on practical usage and digital communication, whereas the traditional programmes, which are not related to technology and are increasingly associated with the old economy, are losing their appeal among students.

Given this development, it may be crucial for academics in language education to undertake a comprehensive review of student expectations for both new and old English programmes in Hong Kong.

With the advent of new technologies and communication methods, a significant revamp of language courses whether at self-funded or government-funded tertiary institutions in Hong Kong might be necessary in meeting student expectations in the digital era.

Before reforming language education, however, it might be worthwhile for educators to investigate what would enhance student satisfaction with the English courses offered locally.

Understanding the views of other stakeholders, including teachers and employers, through focus group interviews, would also be helpful.

Alan Poon, council member, City University of Hong Kong

Why have a work meeting when we can WhatsApp?

Regardless of whether meetings are conducted face-to-face or online, they can be unproductive due to sabotage by a routine cast of personalities.

There’s the talker who meanders off topic, the dogged dissenter fixed in their view, and the chair-warmer whose stony silence epitomises the “see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing” ethos, thus remaining safe, secure and uncontroversial.

Meetings are the scourge of the workplace, yet not proven to measurably improve policy and procedure development, much less employee morale.

There is no guarantee that a costly round-table gathering is superior to an iterative online discussion (on WhatsApp, for instance) that takes place non-synchronously and thoughtfully over several days. The latter bears fruit by organically growing and refining an outline that eventually captures trackable consensus. And unlike a traditional meeting, there is no need to burden a delegate with taking the minutes.

In my experience, face-to-face meetings might divert hospital doctors from urgent patient care that cannot be delayed. Ten senior doctors slugging out it out at a talkfest while other colleagues are glued to their smartphone screen feeds could probably pay for an additional working day for a doctor to look after patients. Meanwhile, the stressed senior doctor who drew the short straw and is deputising for the colleagues stuck in the meeting has to tackle the long list of patients pretty much alone.

Meetings are costly, a waste of staff time, and could even be harmful if junior colleagues or time-critical issues are put on hold while meeting participants are not to be disturbed.

Joseph Ting, Brisbane, Australia

Maybe we’re just not that into English

I refer to the letter, “Teach grammar properly for solid foundation in English” (June 13).

Your correspondent is right in saying that the English paper of the Diploma of Secondary Education does not explicitly test a candidate’s knowledge of grammar, leading to a “de-emphasis on grammar instruction”. This, however, isn’t the only reason behind the decline in language competence among young locals.

Learning a language from scratch, which often involves learning grammar rules by rote, is too tedious for them. The grammar taught in school seems to sound the same at primary and secondary levels, even though it gets more difficult.

To students, life outside the classroom is more challenging and fun. Computer games, which are preferred by many, offer satisfaction that language learning cannot match.

In Hong Kong, communicative language teaching has been deemed more flexible and practical than teaching grammar to children. The adoption of this approach in recent years has made classroom learning livelier, yet our students who are learning English as a second or foreign language don’t have a good grasp of the basics any more.

Having said that, it seems a good foundation in language isn’t necessary these days. When students complete their assignments, they can use computer tools to automatically correct their writing. This naturally reduces their incentive to improve their language skills.

When society focuses on technology and commerce, so does the job market. So we may continue to hear of highly competent job applicants who can’t write a decent cover letter.

Jacqueline Kwan, Sai Ying Pun

Post