Advertisement
Opinion | A smart Hong Kong would embrace Uber
- Ride-hailing services like Uber offer cleaner, more efficient urban transport which cuts the need for car ownership and therefore traffic and pollution
- Uber is not the ultimate answer, but fully adopting the service is a step in the right direction if Hong Kong aims to be a smart city
Reading Time:4 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
10
![Illustration: Craig Stephens](https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/1020x680/public/d8/images/canvas/2024/05/31/87fe3385-d5c4-4810-9888-c62c046288e3_4a75cfa3.jpg?itok=QMbZTaa8&v=1717112357)
Why do people pay a premium to hail an Uber ride instead of a taxi? The difference is not insignificant: an Uber can easily cost up to 15-20 per cent more.
Advertisement
Uber is not perfect. In my experience, there were times when the app could not find a driver, confirmed rides were cancelled without explanation or took much longer than indicated. Sometimes the ride itself was a poor experience although, for me, this happened rarely.
But people continue to pay more to use Uber, citing cleaner vehicles, more comfortable rides and a better attitude from drivers. It certainly appears to offer more than the conventional taxi service and perhaps there is more than meets the eye with Uber’s popularity.
So, last year, I conducted an experiment. For one month, I took Uber to work every morning, across the harbour, rain or shine. For those 20 working days, the luxury service set me back about HK$3,000; the monthly expense is certainly not low.
But I finally realised what value Uber was providing – and I do not mean the simple convenience of taking me from A to B.
Advertisement
A lot of the debate over Uber is about the sharing economy, the negative impact on the taxi industry, licences and insurance concerns. As a designer, however, I see how Uber benefits urban development and transport.
![loading](https://assets-v2.i-scmp.com/production/_next/static/media/wheel-on-gray.af4a55f9.gif)
Advertisement