Advertisement

My Take | China’s censorship of voices critical of proposed cyberspace ID sets a worrying precedent

  • Chinese law requires new regulations to solicit public feedback, but legitimate concerns about giving netizens a single national ID are being silenced

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
2
A man holds an iPhone as he visits Sina’s Weibo microblogging site in Shanghai on May 29, 2012. Photo: Reuters

In a proposed regulation published online for public solicitation last month, China’s Ministry of Public Security and the Cyberspace Administration outlined in a 16-article document plans for an national identification system that would authenticate the country’s netizens on all internet platforms. But there are worrying signs that public feedback is going unheeded.

Advertisement

In accordance with Chinese law, the proposed regulation was published to solicit feedback from the public as a necessary step before it becomes law. In theory, every Chinese citizen has the right to give feedback about the regulation until August 25.

The draft, titled National Network Identity Authentication Public Service Management Measures, has caught widespread attention, as it would affect every internet user in China. Like many newly proposed regulations, it is controversial.

Some people agree with regulators that a unified cyberspace ID – made up of unique strings of numbers and letters assigned to each person online – can help prevent internet platforms from abusing the use of personal data. Others, however, have questioned whether the regulation is necessary and whether it creates a single source for the state to turn off a person’s access to all internet services.

Tsinghua University law professor Lao Dongyan has emerged as one of the more prominent voices against the proposed cyberspace ID, but she was muted on Chinese social media. Photo: Baidu
Tsinghua University law professor Lao Dongyan has emerged as one of the more prominent voices against the proposed cyberspace ID, but she was muted on Chinese social media. Photo: Baidu

Currently, an internet user who violates rules on one platform can have their account locked or shut down but still be able to access other platforms. If every online account is linked to a single ID number, though, the government could in theory require all platforms block the user for an infraction on any one of them.

Advertisement
One of the most vocal voices against the regulation is Lao Dongyan, a criminal law professor at China’s prestigious Tsinghua University. Her public opposition to the regulation was quickly censored and she received personal attacks from some nationalist social media accounts. When she complained about the attacks and compared them to the so-called big-character posters used for propaganda and other purposes during the Cultural Revolution, her Weibo account was muted.
Advertisement