India’s recent general elections were spread out over the course of six weeks but still managed to provide a thrill. The results suggest the Indian voter decided to humble the mighty and restore balance.
Advertisement
The victory for Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the Bharatiya Janata Party and its alliance partners has secured a mandate for political and economic reform, although they will have to engage in negotiations and are likely to face stronger opposition. Modi’s victory was widely expected, but needing a coalition to form a government was not.
As Modi begins his third term, India’s “Act East” policy is poised for a recalibration. New Delhi’s economic and strategic engagement with Southeast Asia saw an upswing during his first two terms, albeit with some shortcomings that require a course correction. Modi may now inject new vigour into this key foreign policy as India seeks to establish a stronger Indo-Pacific presence.
On the economic front, trade and investment links with Southeast Asian nations have received a major boost, with annual bilateral trade surging from around US$80 billion in 2014 to more than US$110 billion by 2021-22. However, the existing trade accord with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations – the Asean-India Free Trade Area – is seen as heavily favouring the Asean side, frustrating India.
India’s exports to Southeast Asia saw a moderate increase in the 2023 financial year, rising to US$44 billion from US$42.3 billion the previous year. Meanwhile, imports from Asean nations rose at a sharper pace, from US$68 billion to US$87.6 billion, resulting in a substantial trade deficit of US$43.6 billion for India. The need to address the trade imbalance is all the more pressing given that the trade deficit was just US$5 billion in 2011.
03:14
Modi’s BJP claims ‘historic’ victory in Indian election despite smaller majority
Modi’s BJP claims ‘historic’ victory in Indian election despite smaller majority
On the other hand, the economic outreach to Asean nations under Modi’s government has been hampered by a reluctance to undertake market reforms and liberalise tariffs. This has led to frustration among several Southeast Asian states, leaving the economic dimension of Act East lagging behind the policy objectives.