Advertisement

Explainer | Why have Hong Kong’s opposition figures been charged with subversion and does the camp now face total wipeout?

  • On Sunday, 47 opposition figures were charged with conspiring to subvert state power
  • Prosecutors say their election strategy of attempting to win a majority in the Legislative Council was part of a plot to overthrow the government

Reading Time:5 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
56
Localist candidates attend a press conference in Mong Kok on the democratic primaries. Photo: Sam Tsang
A total of 47 opposition activists were charged under the national security law on Sunday with conspiring to subvert state power over their roles in an unofficial primary run-off election authorities linked to a plot to overthrow the government.
Advertisement
While prosecutors on Monday argued in court that the group’s plan to take control of the 70-member Legislative Council at the now-postponed elections was part of a wider push to paralyse the administration, authorities have been accused of trying to quash political dissent in the city.

Here are the key details of the largest prosecution mounted under the security legislation.

06:05

47 Hong Kong opposition activists charged with subversion under national security law

47 Hong Kong opposition activists charged with subversion under national security law

What are opposition activists accused of?

It was not the first time the opposition in Hong Kong held internal primaries to shortlist their best candidates to compete in official elections. There were at least two run-off polls for the 2007 Legislative Council by-election in the Hong Kong Island constituency, and the 2012 chief executive polls.

But the 2020 primary drew an unprecedented scale of attention – and also attacks from the authorities – because of the opposition’s ambitious “35-plus” plan: to win a majority in the legislature riding on the anti-government sentiment triggered by the protests against the now-withdrawn extradition bill the year before.

Advertisement

Benny Tai Yiu-ting, a legal academic and leading opposition figure, who first drafted the strategy last March, said at the time that a majority would give the camp a “massive constitutional weapon” to press the government to address their demands by vetoing the budget.

Advertisement