Advertisement

Hong Kong’s pro-establishment bloc moves to pull quorum calls, other delaying tactics from opposition’s Legco playbook

  • Time limits on speeches and caps on the number of lawmakers who can join panels and committees also to be discussed at rules meeting
  • But critics say the changes would cripple the ability to offer any effective resistance to legislation

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
3
Proposals have been floated to further curb filibustering in the Legislative Council. Photo: Nora Tam
Hong Kong’s pro-establishment lawmakers are pushing for another overhaul of the legislature’s rule book in a bid to further curb filibustering, two months after the mass departure of their opposition counterparts.
Advertisement

But critics fear the latest batch of amendments will “fully” limit dissent and effectively bar lawmakers from voicing concerns over controversial bills in the future.

The proposals – which consisted of more than 100 pages of documents jointly suggested by several pro-establishment lawmakers – were floated more than two months after nearly all of the city’s opposition legislators resigned over a Beijing resolution that disqualified four of their colleagues for perceived disloyalty.

Paul Tse Wai-chun, chairman of the rules of procedure committee in the Legislative Council, confirmed that more than 20 amendments were discussed during a closed-door meeting on Wednesday afternoon.

Among the amendments was one that would scrap the rules allowing lawmakers to make quorum call requests – a tactic frequently used by the opposition to delay proceedings by forcing a headcount.

Under the newly proposed rules, lawmakers would only be allowed to ask the Legco president for a quorum call directly before a vote.

Advertisement

“[Quorum calls] have always been [an issue] for this legislature,” Tse said after the meeting. “On one hand we have Basic Law Article 75 confining us to a basic quorum, [but on the other], we have been wasting a lot of time when requests for quorum calls were abused time and again. We have been trying to find a way to get around the Basic Law.”

Advertisement