Hong Kong lawmakers warned to stick to exact wording of their oaths at first Legislative Council meeting
Warning from Legco secretariat comes as some localists plan to add to the affirmations they take
Lawmakers-elect should read the Legislative Council oath without change in order to be sworn in, the Legco secretariat has warned as some localist members were planning to read their own versions to state their political views at next month’s inaugural meeting.
The secretariat said in a media briefing on Tuesday that lawmakers could not add or subtract words from the affirmation.
“The court judgment in 2004 stated clearly that oath-taking was a very strict process under the Basic Law,” a secretariat officer said. “It is the constitutional duty for lawmakers to be sworn in in accordance with the law – to follow it word for word.”
Asked if a lawmaker advocated Hong Kong independence or nation building right before or after the oath, the secretariat said it would have to determine the validity of the oath case by case.
The officer was referring to the court ruling in 2004 that “Long Hair” Leung Kwok-hung was not allowed to swear allegiance to the people of Hong Kong and the mainland and to fight for democracy, in addition to the legal requirements in the oath of upholding the Basic Law and bearing allegiance to Hong Kong. Leung later got round the rule by adding his own words before and after the affirmation.
At least two localists have said they will come up with their own distinct ways of taking the oath in the first council meeting on October 12.
