HKU legal scholars back calls to delay vote on 2017 electoral reform
HKU legal academics say the public needs more time to discuss options on electoral reform, but officials and lawmakers shoot down the idea
Two legal academics have supported calls for next month's crucial vote on electoral reform to be put on hold - possibly until after the Legco elections next year - to give the public more time to discuss how they will choose the chief executive in 2017.
Public opinion is sharply divided on the government's electoral reform package and pan-democratic lawmakers have vowed to veto it unless Beijing makes a "significant compromise" over its stringent framework.
However, the suggestion of a postponement received a lukewarm response from top government officials and lawmakers across the political spectrum.
Acting chief executive Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor and Executive Council convenor Lam Woon-kwong said it would be not be feasible to put off the vote or to amend the proposal.
Peking University law professor Rao Geping , who also sits on the national legislature's Basic Law Committee, said he believed the central government would not answer pan-democrats' demands to amend its framework.
Professor Johannes Chan Man-mun, former law dean at the University of Hong Kong, said: "The postponement is not for the sake of postponement, but rather we want to buy time to explore further options so we can forge a larger consensus for support of the next stage."
His colleague Professor Albert Chen Hung-yee suggested the government consider deferring the vote until after the Legco election next year if it still could not get enough support in the days before lawmakers cast their ballots.
