bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

articlePageQuery

filter

article

articleBaseAdvertisingInfoArticle

articleListArticle

articleSeoArticle

helpersCheckIsPostiesArticle

hooksArticleAcknowledgementGateOverlayArticle

hooksTrackPageViewArticle

hooksContentInterestArticle

articleLinkingDataContent

articleSchemaContent

liveArticle

advertZone

sentiment

contentLock

topics

types

sections

moreOnThisArticles

urlAlias

commentCount

sponsorType

authorLocations

authors

paywallTypes

corrections

displaySlideShow

multimediaEmbed

printHeadline

seriesContainer

socialHeadline

headline

flag

firstTopic

glossary

flattenTypeIds

publishedDate

additionalInfoBoxes

images

image

relatedLinks

relatedNewsletters

__typename

createdDate

sponsor

factSheets

series

disableOffPlatformContent

published

updatedDate

summary

subHeadline

body

keywords

copyrighted

customTimezone

liveContents

FANNY W.Y. FUNG

A share market analyst is going into battle against the privacy watchdog in a dispute sparked by an order for him to remove information from his website.
In August last year, the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data ordered David Webb, who runs Webb-site.com to redact the names of people who appeared in reports on three court judgments handed down years ago.
The names were included in files on a matrimonial case published on the judiciary's website in 2000, 2001 and 2002, following open court hearings.
Webb's website, which offers information on Hong Kong affairs for investors, then published three reports on the case with hyperlinks to the judgments.
Years later the judiciary redacted the names on its website, and subsequently, the privacy commissioner ordered Webb to remove the names from his website following a complaint from Luciana Wong Wai-lan. But Wong withdrew the complaint on January 8.
Wong sits on the boards of four public bodies including the appeals board on town planning and environmental impact assessments.
Webb took down the reports, but lodged an appeal against the commissioner's decision. The case will be heard by the Administrative Appeals Board on July 13.
"The implications … if the order is upheld would have a chilling effect on publishing within Hong Kong," Webb argued on his website yesterday.
Legislative Council security panel member James To Kun-sun said the case was similar to the debate on the "right to be forgotten" on search engine Google.
"If Webb loses, it will reflect a problem with our laws. How can authorities ask someone to take down information that has been in the public domain?" he said.


Market analyst clash with Hong Kong privacy watchdog over names made public on website

James To Kun-sun said the case may reflect a problem with laws.

News

Hong Kong

Law and Crime

Order to remove names already made public from website sparks legal battle


A share market analyst is going into battle against the privacy watchdog in a dispute sparked by an order for him to remove information from his website.
