Advertisement

Hong Kong activist to pay HK$100,000 for needless court bid to challenge protest song ban

  • Court of Appeal denies request from jailed activist Chow Hang-tung to challenge decision barring her from contesting song injunction order

Reading Time:2 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
1
Chow Hang-tung  is currently detained under the Beijing-decreed national security law for allegedly inciting subversion. Photo: Getty Images
A Hong Kong court has ordered a jailed activist to pay HK$100,000 (US$12,800) to authorities for making a “totally unmeritorious” request to allow her to contest a ban on the promotion of a popular 2019 protest song.
Advertisement
The Court of Appeal on Thursday refused to allow Chow Hang-tung to challenge an earlier decision barring her from filing grounds of objection against an injunction order on “Glory to Hong Kong”, which was mistaken for the national anthem of China at several overseas sports events.

Chief Judge of the High Court Jeremy Poon Shiu-chor and Madam Justice Carlye Chu Fun-ling ordered Chow to bear the legal expenses incurred by the justice minister in her failed appeal bid, including for hiring two senior counsel, assessed to be HK$100,000 on a “broad-brush approach”.

The justices said in a written ruling that Chow was in no position to challenge the ban, as she was neither a defendant nor party to the civil injunction proceedings.

They noted the activist, who is now detained under the Beijing-decreed national security law for allegedly inciting ­subversion, did not admit she had used or intended to use the song with criminal intent.
Advertisement

While the lower Court of First Instance had previously allowed anyone opposing the justice secretary’s application to obtain the relevant court documents and substantiate their objections in writing, they still needed to apply separately for permission to intervene, the judges added.

“There is no reasonable prospect in the applicant’s appeal and no other reason why it should be heard in the interests of justice,” the judgment said.

Advertisement