Advertisement
Judge warns ‘Glory to Hong Kong’ protest song ban might not have effect government wants
- Mr Justice Anthony Chan says injunction might not be any different from national security law sanction against use of song with seditious intent
- He adds ban may also breach double jeopardy rule, but admits if song presented national security threat, that outweighs ‘chilling effect’ of prohibition
Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
Proposed restrictions on a Hong Kong song popular during the 2019 anti-government protests may not accomplish what the city authorities want to achieve, a judge has told a hearing on the unprecedented application.
Advertisement
Mr Justice Anthony Chan Kin-keung on Friday told the High Court an injunction against “Glory to Hong Kong” might not work differently from the Beijing-imposed 2020 national security law to sanction people who published or promoted the song with seditious intent.
The judge added that the proposed order might also fall foul of the legal prohibition on double jeopardy and subject offenders to punishments for a criminal offence and civil contempt.
But if the anti-government tune presented a national security threat that would outweigh any risk of a “chilling effect” a ban might create, he said.
“I would have thought that given the importance of national security, [in] balancing against the chilling effect, I suppose, it wouldn’t be a very difficult exercise to rule in favour of national security,” the judge said.
Advertisement