Advertisement

Hong Kong 47: witness tells court 2020 opposition primary plan turned into ‘insane’ proposal for ‘mutual destruction’

  • Au Nok-hin says he insisted primary candidates should not be forced to veto budgets due to risk of breaching national security law
  • Former legislator also tells court former law professor Benny Tai went too far with plan to cause ‘bloody’ confrontation with Beijing

Reading Time:2 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
Au Nok-hin, who is giving evidence for the prosecution in the trial of 16 people accused of subversion over a 2020 opposition primary. Photo: Winson Wong
The nature of a 2020 legislative primary election changed from selecting the best candidates among Hong Kong’s opposition camp to an “insane” blueprint for “mutual destruction” after its driving force pushed to incorporate the agenda into the unofficial event, a one-time ally turned prosecution witness has told a subversion trial.
Advertisement

Au Nok-hin, an ex-politician, on Wednesday said it was “regrettable” that former law professor Benny Tai Yiu-ting had written a series of articles that favoured blocking government budgets and bills in the Legislative Council as a means of toppling the city’s leader.

“I once thought that [whether to veto the budgets] was a choice to be made by individual candidates, but, as he gradually published articles about ‘mutual destruction’ in June [2020], I started to feel that his views had led to changes in the nature of the primary election,” Au told the West Kowloon Court.

Benny Tai, who is alleged to have been the driving force behind an “insane” plan to topple the chief executive through an unofficial opposition primary in 2020. Photo: Nora Tam
Benny Tai, who is alleged to have been the driving force behind an “insane” plan to topple the chief executive through an unofficial opposition primary in 2020. Photo: Nora Tam

The former Democratic Party lawmaker said he had insisted that contenders in the unofficial poll in July that year should not be forced to veto budgets regardless of their merits because of the “very high” risk of breaching the Beijing-imposed national security law that had just come into force.

Advertisement