Advertisement

Hong Kong media tycoon Jimmy Lai cannot be held liable for criminal offence over office contract breach, fraud trial told

  • Lawyers for Lai and ex-Next Digital executive say firm’s violation of lease terms and defendants’ failure to disclose breach not enough to prove they intended to deceive
  • Lai, 74, faces two counts of fraud for allegedly covering up operations of private firm at the Apple Daily headquarters for more than two decades

Reading Time:2 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
Media tycoon Jimmy Lai arrives at the  District Court in a prison vehicle.  Photo: Jelly Tse
Jailed media tycoon Jimmy Lai Chee-ying cannot be held liable for a criminal offence over a civil breach of contract allegedly stemming from the Apple Daily newspaper’s misuse of its Hong Kong offices, defence counsel has contended in the closing stages of the mogul’s fraud trial.
Advertisement

Rounding up the defence’s arguments at the District Court on Wednesday, lawyers for Lai and a former Next Digital executive said the media company’s violation of land lease terms and the defendants’ failure to disclose the breach were not enough to prove their intention to deceive and conceal.

Instead, counsel submitted that Apple Daily had legitimate reasons to sublease office space to a consultancy firm controlled by Lai to assist in the now-defunct paper’s animation works and accounting matters.

Media mogul Jimmy Lai. Photo: Winson Wong
Media mogul Jimmy Lai. Photo: Winson Wong

Lai, 74, faces two counts of fraud for allegedly covering up the operations of Dico Consultants Limited at the paper’s Tseung Kwan O headquarters for more than two decades in breach of its land lease conditions. Former chief administrative officer Wong Wai-keung, 60, faces one count of the offence for his alleged role since 2016. They have denied the charges.

Next Digital’s then chief financial officer and chief operating officer Royston Chow Tat-kuen, who was previously a defendant in the case, turned against his former boss and colleague in the witness box after prosecutors dropped the charge against the 64-year-old on condition he help in the pair’s prosecution.

The prosecution is seeking the pair’s conviction based on what they considered the defendants’ “deliberate” concealment from, and false representations to, landlord Hong Kong Science and Technology Parks Corporation, concerning Dico’s operation status until it was exposed in 2020.

Advertisement

The court heard that terms for Apple Daily’s land lease included a ban on using office space other than “publishing and printing of newspapers and magazines and ancillary services”.

Advertisement