![](https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/768x768/public/d8/images/canvas/2024/06/11/95dd4772-7718-4e40-b957-59e034e30b7b_f233dfa6.jpg?itok=0gL8QJGB&v=1718112550)
University of Hong Kong leadership row so far: timeline of events
- The Post tracks the leadership row that first surfaced last September and escalated in recent weeks, prompting the government to step in
Tensions first came to light last September when the 25 members of the University of Hong Kong (HKU) governing council received multiple emails from critics, accusing president Xiang Zhang of misconduct over a range of issues, including his handling of donations.
But the conflict persisted even after an independent panel set up by council chairwoman Priscilla Wong Pui-sze cleared Zhang of the allegations in April.
Last month, the council endorsed the appointment of several interim vice-president positions without consulting Zhang, prompting the president to seek legal advice as the row escalated.
Here, the Post tracks the development of the ongoing saga.
September 2023: allegations against Zhang are raised
The anonymous emails accused Zhang of handling donations from a mainland Chinese corporation inappropriately, recruiting a headhunter from the United States to hire a pro-vice-chancellor in institutional advancement and a medical dean, and preferring candidates with US university credentials.
He was also accused of bypassing procedures when replacing the president’s vehicle with a HK$2 million (US$259,200) BMW he favoured without bidding.
Zhang asked that the meeting be postponed, saying the allegations amounted to “extremely serious defamation”, prompting him to seek legal advice and to demand that he had his lawyer attend the session with him.
![HKU president Xiang Zhang addresses reporters on his first day at work in 2018. Photo: K. Y. Cheng](https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/d8/images/canvas/2024/06/11/29a654bc-a486-4245-83cd-7281181047e0_121effb1.jpg)
October 2023: inquiry is launched
The investigation panel was led by Jimmy Ng Wing-ka, chairman of the university’s audit committee, and also consisted of two council members and two non-members.
Council chairwoman Wong at that time said the panel would arrive at its findings through “evidence-based investigation in an unbiased manner” in accordance with the university’s “whistle-blowing” policies and procedures, to ensure the outcome was fair.
April 2024: panel report clears Zhang
Secretary for Education Christine Choi Yuk-lin weighed in on the matter after the governing council said it had accepted the report, calling for the leadership to “learn a lesson” and “let things go”.
Despite her comments, Zhang continued to take a combative stance and expressed vindication that his name had been “finally cleared”.
“I have to point out that the individuals responsible for spreading these rumours have engaged in a severe campaign of slander against both myself and the university through anonymous emails,” he said. “Such behaviour deserves strong condemnation.”
May 2024: surprise senior management reshuffle
The reshuffle effectively demoted the president’s right-hand man, deputy vice-chancellor Richard Wong Yue-chim, who had served as interim provost since 2019.
Years into Zhang’s tenure, many members of the senior management team remained in either acting or interim roles as recruitment efforts dragged on.
Tensions between Zhang and the council were once again reignited with the surprise leadership reshuffle, which one insider called an “coup”. It prompted the president to once again seek legal advice.
![The government on Tuesday set up a group to investigate the escalating leadership row at HKU. Photo: Sam Tsang](https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/d8/images/canvas/2024/06/11/b5be19f9-15bd-4525-910a-ae8d7c4500e1_0c42f09f.jpg)
June 2024: tensions escalate as government steps in
The conflict prompted some HKU alumni – including former education minister Fanny Law Fan Chiu-fun – to issue a petition calling on city leader Lee to step in.
He also accused the council of spreading “untrue content and unfair criticisms”.
![](https://assets-v2.i-scmp.com/production/_next/static/media/wheel-on-gray.af4a55f9.gif)