Advertisement

Legal entitlements of Hong Kong’s same-sex couples unlikely to change, experts say

Landmark court ruling over spousal visa welcomed by supporters, but lack of anti-discrimination laws means changes require time

Reading Time:4 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
15
A rainbow flag at the second Hong Kong Pride Parade march from Southorn Playground to Chater Garden. Photo: Jonathan Wong

The decision to grant a spousal visa to a gay woman has been welcomed by business groups and banks and heralded as a mood change on LGBT rights in Hong Kong – but it won’t affect the legal entitlement of same-sex couples to other benefits, according to experts.

Advertisement

On Monday, the Court of Appeal unanimously ruled that a British expat, identified only as QT, would be given a dependant visa through her same-sex partner who works in Hong Kong – an immigration status previously granted only to heterosexual spouses.

QT, a British citizen, entered into a civil union in England just months before she moved to Hong Kong in 2011 with her partner SS, who had been offered a job in the city.

Lesbian expatriate wins landmark appeal against Hong Kong Immigration Department to secure spousal visa

She applied for a judicial review after the Immigration Department rejected her application for a spousal visa, then appealed after losing her case at the Court of First Instance.

Gay marriage is not legal in Hong Kong, and there are no anti-discrimination laws over sexual orientation. The case sets a precedent which suggests other same sex spouses will also be eligible for a dependant visa, unless the Immigration Department appeals the decision or is able to find a loophole in applying the decision.

Duncan Abate, an employment lawyer at the Hong Kong office of global law firm Mayer Brown JSM, said Monday’s “brave and forward-thinking” decision was “to be applauded”.

Advertisement

“It is a clear indication to the community generally that this is a direction in which the government has to be moving,” he said.

Advertisement