US imposed sanctions based on highly subjective assessments of officials, Jimmy Lai’s Hong Kong trial hears
- Prosecution reads out reports by City University Professor Wang Guiguo on impact of US laws designed to penalise alleged perpetrators of human rights violations in Hong Kong
- Wang compiled reports at request of national security police investigating Lai and anti-China conspiracy he allegedly orchestrated
The prosecution on Friday read out two reports by City University Professor Wang Guiguo on the nature and impact of various US laws designed to penalise the alleged perpetrators of human rights violations in Hong Kong.
Wang referred to the 2019 Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act and noted a non-American could be held responsible for undermining the city’s fundamental freedoms through the “extrajudicial rendition, arbitrary detention or torture of any person in Hong Kong” or “other gross violations of internationally recognised human rights”.
“The terms such as ‘responsible’, ‘arbitrary’, ‘gross’ et cetera are subject to highly subjective judgment. As they are to be interpreted in conjunction with other US laws, misinterpretation or even abuse cannot be avoided,” the professor argued.
“This in practice constitutes a coercion that furthers the already severe impacts of the intended sanctions under the [act].”