Advertisement
Advertisement
Science
Get more with myNEWS
A personalised news feed of stories that matter to you
Learn more
The US and China spent US$806 billion and $668 billion, respectively on R&D in 2021, but China’s rate of investment rate was twice that of the United States, according to Washington’s inaugural State of the Science address. Photo: Xinhua

Top American scientist warns China could soon overtake US in STEM leadership

  • National Academy of Sciences president Marcia McNutt notes ‘worrying trends’ in China’s rising R&D spending, published studies
Science
The US appears to be losing the race for global scientific leadership to China but could counter the trend by adapting to the emerging research environment and trying “new things”, according to a senior American science official.
Delivering last month’s inaugural State of the Science address in Washington, National Academy of Sciences (NAS) president Marcia McNutt said the US was still the world’s biggest investor in research and development, but it would not be long before China took over.

The US spent US$806 billion versus China’s US$668 billion on R&D in 2021, but China’s rate of investment was twice that of the United States, said McNutt, a geophysicist and the first woman president of the NAS since its establishment in 1863.

McNutt is also the first woman editor-in-chief of Science magazine, and was elected as a foreign member of the Chinese Academy of Sciences in 2019.

Since the end of World War II, the US had been “not just world-leading but world-dominating” in science and engineering, accounting for nearly 60 per cent of all Nobel Prizes ever awarded, she said.

Meanwhile, China has been catching up quickly in both the quantity and quality of papers published, while doubling the number of patents filed by the US in 2021. “This all suggests to me that there are very worrying trends.”

Various ranking methods, including those used by analytical institutions in the US, Britain and Japan, all suggest that China has surpassed the US in the number of most-cited papers, a key measure of research impact.
According to McNutt, the US has become “exceptionally dependent” on international students in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM), including from China and India.

Foreign students not only outnumbered domestic students in American university graduate programmes, 65 per cent remained in the US for at least 10 years, maintaining the country’s STEM workforce, she said.

“We literally couldn’t fill our STEM jobs if it were not for these foreign students coming and staying in the US.”

26:05

China is boldly going where no one has gone before

China is boldly going where no one has gone before
However, as China’s R&D efforts have grown, US universities have seen a decline in the number of Chinese students in recent years. “International students have so many choices, and we are no longer a destination of choice,” McNutt said.

McNutt recommended protecting US leadership in science by strengthening its own K-12 STEM education and building a domestic scientific workforce for the future.

The tradition of having other nations – especially those in Asia – invest in their K-12 training and then “steal their students to come here” should be changed, she said.

According to McNutt, the US should also work on luring “the best and brightest talent” from around the world by reducing red tape for student visas. A top-down national research strategy was also critical to help coordinate R&D spending by government agencies and the private sector, she added.

Fan-Gang Zeng, an auditory scientist from the University of California, Irvine, said McNutt’s talk presented many good ideas, but implementing some of the recommendations would be challenging due to different goals or competing interests.

“Some may even be inherently incompatible, such as federal versus industrial support, domestic versus international students, and national security versus international collaboration,” Zeng wrote on his LinkedIn account.

84