Advertisement

Opinion | Close the door to Ukraine’s Nato membership and one could open to end the war

  • Kyiv’s resilience shows that it does not need to be a full part of the alliance to remain independent

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
23
A Russian soldier fires from D-30 howitzer towards Ukrainian positions in an undisclosed location in Ukraine. Photo: Russian Defence Ministry Press Service via AP
In an interview with the Post published last month, Columbia University professor Jeffrey Sachs said the war in Ukraine could end “tomorrow” through diplomacy.
Advertisement

He said the underlying cause of the conflict was Nato’s enlargement drive since the 1990s to include Ukraine and Georgia, and he maintained that peace could be restored only by removing that cause.

Sachs has been widely respected for decades but differs from mainstream Western media on many issues, including this view of the war.

Some Western analysts and politicians argue that enlargement of the transatlantic security alliance was just an excuse for Russian President Vladimir Putin to invade Ukraine.

They argue that Russia started the war in 2014 with the annexation of Crimea, part of Ukraine at the time, and the invasion by Russian troops in 2022 was an escalation of the ongoing conflict.

Advertisement

For years, Nato members were divided about whether to include Ukraine. There were also efforts to try to “neutralise” Ukraine – or ensure it was neither a Nato nor Russian proxy – by finding ways to guarantee its security without making it part of the alliance.

Advertisement