bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

articlePageQuery

filter

article

articleBaseAdvertisingInfoArticle

articleListArticle

articleSeoArticle

helpersCheckIsPostiesArticle

hooksArticleAcknowledgementGateOverlayArticle

hooksTrackPageViewArticle

hooksContentInterestArticle

articleLinkingDataContent

articleSchemaContent

liveArticle

advertZone

sentiment

contentLock

topics

types

sections

moreOnThisArticles

urlAlias

commentCount

sponsorType

authorLocations

authors

paywallTypes

corrections

displaySlideShow

multimediaEmbed

printHeadline

seriesContainer

socialHeadline

headline

flag

firstTopic

glossary

flattenTypeIds

publishedDate

additionalInfoBoxes

images

image

relatedLinks

relatedNewsletters

__typename

createdDate

sponsor

factSheets

series

disableOffPlatformContent

published

updatedDate

summary

subHeadline

body

keywords

copyrighted

customTimezone

liveContents

WASHPOST

The CIA pulled a number of officers from the US Embassy in Beijing as a precautionary measure following the massive online theft of personal data of federal employees, current and former US officials said.
The move is a concrete impact of the breach, one of two major hacks into Office of Personnel Management computers that were disclosed earlier this year. Officials have privately attributed the hacks to the Chinese government.
The theft of documents has been characterised by senior US officials as political espionage intended to identify spies and people who might be recruited as spies or blackmailed to provide useful information.
Because the OPM records contained the background checks of State Department employees, officials privately said the Chinese could have compared those records with the list of embassy personnel. Anybody not on that list could be a CIA officer.
The CIA’s move was meant to safeguard officers whose agency affiliation might be discovered as a result of the hack, said officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive matter.
The CIA declined to comment.

The disclosure comes as senior defence and intelligence officials on Tuesday tried – not always successfully – to explain to a committee of frustrated lawmakers their policy on deterring foreign governments, such as China, from carrying out cyber-intrusions.
Director of National Intelligence James Clapper,  testifying before the Senate Armed Services Committee, sought to make a distinction between the OPM hacks and cybertheft of US companies’ secrets to benefit another country’s industry. What happened in the OPM case, “as egregious as it was,” Clapper said, was not an attack: “Rather, it would be a form of theft or espionage.”
And, he said, “we, too, practice cyberespionage and . . . we’re not bad at it”. He suggested that the US would not be wise to seek to punish another country for something its own intelligence services do.
“I think it’s a good idea to at least think about the old saw about people who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw rocks.”
That drew a sharp response from Senator John McCain, the committee’s chairman: “So it’s okay for them to steal our secrets that are most important because we live in a glass house? That is astounding.”
Clapper protested that he did not say it was a good thing. “I’m just saying that both nations engage in this,” he said, referring to China and the United States.
Several lawmakers were not satisfied with the lack of a punishment for the OPM theft, despite Clapper’s explanation.
“This is a pretty significant issue that is going to impact millions of Americans,” said Senator Kelly Ayotte. “But it seems to me they are not seeing a response right now from us, and therefore we’re going to continue to see bad behaviour from the Chinese.”
At another point in the hearing, Deputy Defence Secretary Robert Work seemed to stray off-message when he asked what response he would recommend if the Chinese were to carry off another OPM-like cybertheft.
“Sanctions? Retaliation?” asked Senator Dan Sullivan.
“Could be any of those, Senator. Maybe all of the above,” Work responded.
In fact, largely because of the concerns that Clapper outlined, it is unlikely that the administration would impose sanctions or retaliate overtly for the OPM intrusions.
During the Cold War, Senator Martin Heinrich noted, a foreign agent who was nabbed trying to steal US secrets would be kicked out of the country if he or she had diplomatic cover or thrown in jail otherwise.
In the OPM breach, he said, “the US government seems uncertain about what a proportioned response would look like”.
The counterintelligence risks of the OPM breach are significant, Clapper said. He noted that the intelligence agencies do not know specifically whose records were taken. But the scale of the compromise – more than 22 million individuals’ records breached – “has very serious implications … from the standpoint of the intelligence community and the potential for identifying people” who may be undercover.
“Unfortunately,” he said, “this is a gift that’s going to keep on giving for years.”



CIA pulled officers from Beijing after massive cybertheft of US federal personnel records

The US embassy in Beijing. The Central Intelligence Agency has pulled out a number of officers in China 'as a precaution' after the massive online theft of US government personnel records. Photo: US State Department

Deputy Defence Secretary Robert Work told the committee that sanctions and retaliation for the theft might follow. Photo: AFP

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told senators that the US also practices cyberespionage "and we're not bad at it". Photo: Reuters 

5.6 million fingerprints hacked: Cyber attack on US Office of Personnel Management 5 times worse than previously thought 

Chinese hackers are suspected of being behind the attack, which was revealed in June but started early last year. Photo: Reuters

Chinese President Xi Jinping and his US counterpart Barack Obama are expected to discuss cyber security when they meet in the US this week. Photo: AP

US may impose sanctions on Chinese firms over alleged cyber theft of trade secrets ‘as early as next week’

Allegations that Chinese hackers have targeted US companies have put a strain on ties between the two nations. Photo: Reuters

News

China

Diplomacy