customContents

entityId

entityUuid

articlePageQuery

filter

article

articleBaseAdvertisingInfoArticle

articleListArticle

articleSeoArticle

helpersCheckIsPostiesArticle

hooksArticleAcknowledgementGateOverlayArticle

hooksTrackPageViewArticle

hooksContentInterestArticle

articleLinkingDataContent

articleSchemaContent

liveArticle

advertZone

sentiment

contentLock

topics

types

sections

moreOnThisArticles

urlAlias

commentCount

sponsorType

authorLocations

authors

paywallTypes

corrections

displaySlideShow

multimediaEmbed

printHeadline

seriesContainer

socialHeadline

headline

flag

firstTopic

glossary

flattenTypeIds

publishedDate

additionalInfoBoxes

images

image

relatedLinks

relatedNewsletters

__typename

createdDate

sponsor

factSheets

series

knowledgeQuestion

disableOffPlatformContent

published

updatedDate

summary

subHeadline

body

keywords

copyrighted

customTimezone

liveContents

Bochen Han

The US House of Representatives passed a Republican bill restricting electric vehicle tax credits on Thursday that could jeopardise licensing deals between American car makers and Chinese EV battery companies.
The bill, which is opposed by the White House, was passed as the last act of China Week, a House Republican-led effort to advance China-related legislation. About two dozen such bills, including some sharply divisive ones, have cleared the chamber since Monday.
All legislation that passes the House must also clear the full Democrat-led Senate before it can be sent to the president’s desk to be signed into law.
Sponsored by Representative Carol Miller of West Virginia, the End Chinese Dominance of Electric Vehicles in America Act of 2024 would restrict EV tax credits from cars using battery technology licensed from China if the licensing deal is more than US$5 million.
The bill passed 217-192, largely along partisan lines, with only seven Democrats supporting it.
Consumer EVs using batteries made in China are already prohibited from receiving tax credits from the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), US President Joe Biden’s signature 2022 climate legislation.
But that law permits manufacturers licensing Chinese technology to build batteries in the US to receive the credits. It also allows for joint ventures that meet certain conditions.
Advocates of Chinese involvement argue that it could create jobs, let the US benefit from technology transfers and help produce electric cars more cheaply.
A few top American car makers have already taken the bite. The Ford Motor Company intends to license technology from China’s Contemporary Amperex Technology Co Ltd (CATL) – one of the world’s largest battery makers – to produce lithium-ion batteries at its planned battery facility in Michigan.
The plant was initially valued at US$3.5 billion and set to employ about 2,500 workers, though plans have since been scaled back.
General Motors is in talks with CATL about a licensing deal, Bloomberg reported on Thursday. Other companies, including Tesla, have reportedly also been in talks.
Miller’s bill comes as Republican lawmakers have raised concerns about national security risks posed by Chinese involvement in US-based battery plants.
The bill also follows actions by the Biden administration to curb the influence of Chinese EV and battery manufacturers, which currently dominate the global EV supply chain.
In May, the White House announced a quadrupling of so-called section 301 tariffs on Chinese-made electric vehicles to 100 per cent, along with increased tariffs for lithium-ion batteries and other clean energy products like solar cells produced in China.
Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 empowers the government to impose trade sanctions on foreign countries that violate US trade agreements or engage in unfair trade practices.
While the new tariff rates have yet to go into effect, the office of the US Trade Representative is expected to issue a final determination soon.
House Republicans argued on Thursday that the restrictions in the Miller bill would prevent Chinese billionaires from benefiting from American taxpayer funds and curb China’s dominance in the electric vehicle sector.
Democrats countered that the bill would effectively help China maintain its dominance because the IRA credits make US electric car production more viable.
A debate emerged among legislators from Michigan, the base of US auto making. Representative John Moolenaar, the Republican chair of the House select committee on China, argued that “the American people do not want CCP-affiliated companies setting up shop in their towns”, while Representative Debbie Dingell, a Democrat, contended that the bill would “lead to American job losses” and make it “harder for American companies to compete”.

Representative Judy Chu, a California Democrat, raised concerns about a provision in Miller’s bill that expands the list of entities restricted from receiving tax credits to include firms owned by “a citizen, national or resident” of China.
“This bill includes a harmful provision that would target immigrants who came to the United States from an adversary country, but who themselves have nothing to do with their governments of origin,” Chu said.
The White House released a statement opposing Miller’s bill on Wednesday. The legislation, it said, would “raise taxes on American consumers, punish American auto manufacturers, threaten good-paying auto jobs, undermine our administration’s work to protect the American automotive supply chain from unfair Chinese competition, and set back efforts to achieve energy security and combat climate change”.
The United Auto Workers also opposed the bill, calling it an “attack on good union jobs” and a blow to “nearly 2,000 battery manufacturing jobs in Michigan”.
Observers have said it is unlikely that all the bills passed this week will become law before Election Day, November 5, or before the end of the congressional session in January.
Elaine Dezenski, senior director of the Centre on Economic and Financial Power at the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, said that the most significant impact of the “China Week” bills might be the message they send to the business world.
“They signal to the marketplace, to investors, to those who are thinking about investment in China and elsewhere, that the government is acknowledging certain kinds of risks,” she said.


China hit hard by new Dutch export controls on ASML chip-making equipment

TikTok faces crucial court hearing that could decide fate in US

China frees American pastor David Lin who US claims was wrongly jailed

Whoever wins the US election, America isn’t stopping China’s rise

US-China relations

US House approves legislation to restrict tax credits for EVs using Chinese battery technology

A CATL “Shenxing Plus” battery at a trade fair in Xiamen, Fujian province, on Tuesday. The US House has passed a bill to restrict tax credits for any EV using Chinese battery technology. Photo: Xinhua

Representative John Moolenaar, the Michigan Republican who chairs the House select committee on China, supported the bill. Photo: EPA-EFE

Senior US official praises China’s cooperation on export controls for technology transfers

Matthew Axelrod (right), US assistant secretary for export enforcement at the Department of Commerce, speaks at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies in Washington on Thursday, with William Reinsch of CSIS.

A worker in a protective suit peers through a gap in barriers at a closed residential area in Shanghai during lockdown measures in China in May 2022. Photo: Reuters

2 Republicans ask Pentagon to add Chinese battery maker CATL to restricted list

A model of a CATL battery-powered motor at the Munich Motor Show in September.  Two Republican lawmakers have asked the US Defence Department to add CATL to a restricted list of companies allegedly working with Beijing’s military. Photo: Bloomberg

US Senator Marco Rubio at a Trump rally in Miami, Florida. Photo: Bloomberg

Canada signals further tariffs on Chinese, batteries, tech and critical minerals

Canada’s Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland holds a news conference in Ottawa, Ontario, in March 202. Photo: Reuters

News

China

World

United States & Canada

Tech

Tech War

White House opposes bill, saying it would ‘raise taxes on American consumers, punish American auto manufacturers [and] threaten good-paying auto jobs’


White House opposes bill, saying it would ‘raise taxes on American consumers, punish American auto manufacturers [and] threaten good-paying auto jobs’.
