Advertisement

US government should consider China’s approach to national tech champions, says Senator Mark Warner

  • Ranking Democrat Mark Warner suggests ‘dramatic, different approach’ to domestic industrial policy to counter China
  • The US might need to work with ‘Five-Eyes’ allies to build a tech champion able to compete with Huawei

Reading Time:2 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
Senator Mark Warner, a Democrat from Virginia, is pushing for more government support for a 5G champion. Photo: Bloomberg

The US government may need to adopt Beijing’s policy of supporting corporate champions, and work with allies, in order to create alternatives to Chinese 5G wireless technology, a ranking senator said on Monday.

Advertisement

Senator Mark Warner, a Democrat representing Virginia and vice-chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, said that the US should consider taking a “dramatic, different approach”, including an interventionist industrial policy, to create American companies able to compete with Huawei Technologies, the Chinese telecom equipment producer portrayed by the Trump administration as a national security threat.

“We in this country have avoided the notion of industrial policy where the government tries to pick winners and losers. But when we compete with a nation with the size and scope and the focus of China, [current policies] may need to be rethought,” Warner said at the Washington-based United States Institute of Peace, a bipartisan, government-funded think tank.

Warner is also a member of the Senate Finance Committee and a ranking member of the Senate’s National Security and International Trade and Finance Subcommittee.

Huawei’s competitors – Finland’s Nokia, Sweden’s Ericsson and South Korea’s Samsung, in particular – are all great companies, but none of them can count on the kind of financing that China’s government provides the Shenzhen-based firm, according to Warner.

Advertisement

“Should we with our ‘five-eye’ partners … think about how we can combine to have not necessarily an American company but a Western open-democracy type of equivalent that is able to have quality equipment as well as the financing ability to compete?” said Warner, referring to the intelligence-sharing alliance comprising Australia, Britain, Canada, New Zealand and the United States.

Advertisement