Advertisement

Singaporean businessman who ‘showed susceptibility’ to foreign influence served notice under anti-foreign interference law

  • Singapore has served a notice to Philip Chan, 59, a naturalised Singapore citizen, to designate him as a politically significant person
  • He is believed to be the first person to be served such a notice under the Foreign Interference Countermeasures Act that came into force in December

Reading Time:4 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
7
Philip Chan, a 59-year-old naturalised Singaporean businessman, is designated as a politically significant person under the Foreign Interference Countermeasures Act. Photo: Instagram/@Philip Chan

A Singaporean businessman who “has shown susceptibility to be influenced by foreign actors and willingness to advance their interests” has been served a notice under the Foreign Interference Countermeasures Act (Fica).

Advertisement
In a press statement on Friday, the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) said on that account, it has served a notice on Friday to Philip Chan Man Ping, a 59-year-old naturalised Singapore citizen, to designate him as a politically significant person.

“The registrar has assessed that Chan’s activities are directed towards a political end in Singapore, and that it is in the public interest for countermeasures under Fica to be applied to Chan,” it added.

Hong Kong’s home-grown national security legislation, which is currently under its consultation period, has also cited the Foreign Interference Countermeasures Act in its 110-page document.

On espionage-related offences, the financial hub suggested “making reference” to legislations of Australia and Singapore and to replace the concept of “enemy” with “external forces” as the expression of enemy is too restrictive. External forces, nevertheless, could be broader and cover any foreign governments, the authority of any external territory, external political organisation, or its associated entities, it cited.

Advertisement

While on another new proposed offence of “external interference”, the Hong Kong government also suggested referencing the Foreign Interference Countermeasures Act, which introduced offences relating to “clandestine foreign interference by electronic communications activity” with maximum penalties of imprisonment of seven to 14 years.

Advertisement