bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

articlePageQuery

filter

article

articleBaseAdvertisingInfoArticle

articleListArticle

articleSeoArticle

helpersCheckIsPostiesArticle

hooksArticleAcknowledgementGateOverlayArticle

hooksTrackPageViewArticle

hooksContentInterestArticle

articleLinkingDataContent

articleSchemaContent

liveArticle

advertZone

sentiment

contentLock

topics

types

sections

moreOnThisArticles

urlAlias

commentCount

sponsorType

authorLocations

authors

paywallTypes

corrections

displaySlideShow

multimediaEmbed

printHeadline

seriesContainer

socialHeadline

headline

flag

firstTopic

glossary

flattenTypeIds

publishedDate

additionalInfoBoxes

images

image

relatedLinks

relatedNewsletters

__typename

createdDate

sponsor

factSheets

series

disableOffPlatformContent

published

updatedDate

summary

subHeadline

body

keywords

copyrighted

customTimezone

liveContents

Agence France-Presse in Sydney

Former Australian leader John Howard has said he was embarrassed that the US intelligence on weapons of mass destruction he used to justify sending troops to Iraq in 2003 proved to be unfounded.
But he denied that the conflict that toppled Saddam Hussein’s regime is the main reason for the emergence of Islamic State jihadists in Iraq and neighbouring Syria.
Howard, prime minister from 1996 to 2007, said at the time he decided to send Australian soldiers to Iraq with US and British forces it was in the belief that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction.
“I was struck by the force of the language in the American national intelligence assessment late in November 2002,” he told the Seven Network in an interview late on Sunday.

	“I felt embarrassed and I did my best to explain ... that it wasn’t a deliberate deception..”

	John Howard
“It brought together all the American intelligence and paragraph after paragraph, they said, we judge Iraq has got weapons of mass destruction and even talked about potential nuclear capacity.”
“Now that wasn’t made up. It may have been an erroneous conclusion based on the available information but it wasn’t made up.”
No weapons of mass destruction were ever found in Iraq, undermining the basis for the conflict that left thousands of Iraqis and foreign soldiers dead.
“I felt embarrassed, I did. I couldn’t believe it because I had genuinely believed it,” Howard said.
“So, I felt embarrassed and I did my best to explain ... that it wasn’t a deliberate deception.”
Howard also said it was wrong to say that the Iraq conflict alone created Islamic State.
“So much of the Islamic State operation comes out of what is occurring in Syria and to suggest that it’s purely or predominately a result of what happened in Iraq in 2003 is a false reading of history,” he said.

But lawmaker Andrew Wilkie, a former intelligence officer, accused Howard of rewriting history, saying Australia’s own intelligence organisations had provided secret briefings to him that had explained US and British motives for war.
Australia’s intelligence had also cast doubt on whether Baghdad had the weapons, he said, making instead a compelling case that it had a disjointed and contained programme that was not a threat to the region, let alone Australia.
“It’s not good enough for John Howard to cherry pick one particular report and to hold that up as the evidence to use for him to rewrite history,” Wilkie told reporters on Monday.
He said there was no doubt the Islamic State group had emerged from the war.
“If we had not gone to war 11-and-a-half years ago ... then the circumstances would not exist for IS to have emerged and grown strong,” he said.
 


Australia's ex-PM Howard ‘embarrassed’ by Iraq war dossier on weapons of mass destruction

Former Australian Prime Minister John Howard. Photo: AFP

lawmaker Andrew Wilkie, a former intelligence officer, has accused John Howard of rewriting history. Photo: Screenshot

Australian soldiers secure the perimeters of the Australian embassy in Baghdad in 2003. Photo: AFP

News

Asia

US dossier detailing presence of weapons of mass destruction widely used in 2003 to justify Iraq war now causes ex-leader embarrassment
