How to get the mob wife aesthetic with vintage fur like Rihanna, Sofia Coppola and Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen – classic 70s pieces from Gucci and Saint Laurent are the ethical face of fur in 2024
- Is it OK to wear vintage fur? More sustainable than faux fur and more ethical than new fur, preloved pieces have found favour with the A-list likes of Rihanna, Sofia Coppola, Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen, Saweetie and Winnie Harlow
- Launched last November, the International Fur Federation’s FurCycle system classifies furs aged 20 years and above as vintage, and those made at least three years ago as pre-owned – but is a backlash brewing?
How vintage fur starting trending in 2024
Furs aged 20 years and above will be classified as vintage, and those made at least three years ago as pre-owned. The IFF said of the new system, launched in November, that it represents a “a meticulous inspection process by a certified professional furrier, ensuring it meets the highest standards of quality and authenticity”. It follows FurMark, launched one year earlier, a global certification and traceability system for natural fur.
Johnny Valencia, owner of the Los Angeles-based celebrity go-to vintage store Pechuga Vintage, says not all vintage fur is created (or maintained) equally, or worth the investment.
What to look for when shopping for vintage fur?
“Definitely quality. Never purchase pieces that are falling apart,” he says. “Fur is very difficult to repair because it’s panelled and unless you have someone that knows how to work the construction of a garment or has handled fur then I say it’s best to skip on the piece altogether. Look also for any missing patches of hair on your fur: this will indicate that the skin has dried out from severe sun exposure or improper storage.”