Advertisement

Opinion | To put wind back in Hong Kong’s sails, youth outreach must go full speed ahead

  • The government’s youth development blueprint is a good start and paints a positive picture, but its implementation must steer clear of top-down dogma
  • This would be an opportune time to do more to integrate the city’s ethnic minorities into the wider population

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
3
Youngsters on the University of Hong Kong campus in December last year. Photo: Dickson Lee
As Hong Kong grapples with steering its youth, it is encouraging to see Chief Executive John Lee Ka-chiu moving with speed to tackle fundamental issues. The government’s intent is articulated in its youth development blueprint unveiled in December last year and the creation of the new position of commissioner of youth. The contours of engagement and accountability are immediately discernible.
Advertisement

The document’s foreword opens with a quote from President Xi Jinping’s speech on the occasion of the 25th anniversary of Hong Kong’s return to China: “Hong Kong will prosper only when its young people thrive; Hong Kong will develop only when its young people achieve well-rounded development; and Hong Kong will have a bright future only when its young people have good career prospects.”

Central to the blueprint’s four areas of engagement – exploration, hope, empowerment and contribution – is the nurturing of “a new generation of young people with affection for our country and Hong Kong”.

The recurring leitmotif is national education which, revolutionary terminology aside, is unexceptional. All countries take pride in their achievements. The frequent underlining, however, reveals unease in dealing with the city’s youth.

There is a real danger of this exercise slipping from useful multi-channel dialogue into shrill top-down dogma. As history shows, patriotism is imbibed over time with growing awareness, participation and a sense of belonging.

Advertisement

Chinese history must be part of the curriculum as fact rather than emotive prodding and education must focus on both Mandarin and English as twin tools for international advancement without in any way diluting Hong Kong’s rich Cantonese heritage.

Advertisement