Advertisement

Opinion | Are China’s ‘provocative’ actions in the South China Sea lawful? It’s complicated

  • China should not allow its fishermen to enter the Philippine EEZ without permission, to harass or block Philippine fishermen from fishing there or to try to intimidate other claimants
  • But in territories claimed by Beijing and Manila, both have a right to be there

Reading Time:4 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
18
Filipino fishermen sail past a Chinese coastguard ship in the Scarborough Shoal in the South China Sea on February 5. Photo: AFP
In last week’s joint statement, the Philippines and United States hit out at China for “its unlawful maritime claims, militarisation of reclaimed features, and threatening and provocative activities in the South China Sea”, including the “repeated massing” of its maritime militia vessels in the Philippine exclusive economic zone (EEZ).
Advertisement

Such alleged depredations have been amply repeated in the media without qualification. Although viewed as wholly provocative by rival claimants, some of China’s actions are reasonable and legal. Others are not. Policymakers, analysts and the media should distinguish between the two.

Here are some examples. On March 10, a Chinese coastguard vessel warned a Philippine coastguard plane with journalists flying over a disputed area: “You have entered [waters] around a Chinese reef and constituted a security threat. To avoid misunderstanding, leave immediately.”

The Philippine pilot maintained he was within Philippine territory. But if he was flying over a high-tide feature or its territorial sea, both China and the Philippines have a legal basis for their actions, according to the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (Unclos).

Advertisement

China claims sovereignty to all features in the South China Sea and views occupiers as violating its sovereignty. To support a sovereignty claim to a high-tide feature, a country must show continuous, effective occupation or control, and acquiescence by other claimants.

Advertisement