Advertisement

Opinion | US-Iran sea drone dispute highlights vast scope for conflict over unmanned vessels

  • The US says Iran was trying to capture the unmanned surface vessel, while Tehran claims it was trying to ensure safety of navigation
  • With the US updating its commander’s handbook to categorise such unmanned vessels as warships, there are likely to be more similar incidents in the Gulf and elsewhere

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
1
A Saildrone Explorer unmanned surface vessel is seen in the Arabian Gulf off Bahrain’s coast on January 27. The US Naval Forces Central Command began operationally testing the vessel as part of an initiative to integrate new unmanned systems and artificial intelligence into US 5th Fleet operations. Photo: US Central Command/ AFP
The US Navy has accused Iran of trying to capture one of its unmanned surface vessels (USV) in the Persian Gulf. Vice Admiral Brad Cooper, commander of US Naval Forces Central Command, called Iran’s actions “flagrant, unwarranted and inconsistent with the behaviour of a professional maritime force”.
Advertisement

The navy says its Saildrone Explorer was unlawfully taken from international waters in the Persian Gulf. After being told that the drone was US government property and that it wanted it back, the Iranian naval support ship towing the USV released it. General Michael Erik Kurilla, commander of US Central Command, said, “This incident once again demonstrates Iran’s continued destabilising illegal and unprofessional activity in the Middle East.”

But Iran may have had good reasons for what it did.

Advertisement

A Saildrone Explorer is a wind- and solar-powered USV capable of collecting scientific data for up to 12 months. The vessel in question is a militarised version that has been deployed as part of Operation Sentinel – a multinational task force established to “increase surveillance of and security in key waterways in the Middle East”.

Iranian news reports said the unmanned vessel’s “navigation system had failed” and that the device posed a danger to international shipping. It is a customary duty of mariners to remove such hazards. After being told that the device belonged to the US Navy, the Iranians explained their concern regarding its threat to the safety of navigation and returned it. From Iran’s perspective, this was not an attempted theft but a professional contribution to the safety of navigation.

Advertisement