Advertisement

The View | Multilateralism under fire as US pushes world bodies to take sides in Ukraine war

  • International organisations must be free to adhere to their founding missions, ensuring that only economic considerations influence their decisions
  • Bullying those who disagree with the US or refuse to take sides is wrong and threatens to poison the heart of multilateralism

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
18
Gita Gopinath, first deputy managing director of the International Monetary Fund, speaks outside the institution’s headquarters in Washington, DC, on October 13, 2020. International organisations have exhibited nuanced differences in their statements on the war in Ukraine. The IMF vowed to support Ukraine on the financing and policy fronts. Photo: AFP
Amid the war in Ukraine launched by Russia, the United States is launching an invisible war against multilateralism within major international economic organisations, forcing them to take political sides. Its actions put the international character of those organisations at risk, trampling their charters and the international rule of law.
Advertisement

At the International Monetary Fund, the US, Britain and Canada moved to suspend the ceremonial role of dean, held by Russian representative Aleksei Mozhin. This successfully served as a token punishment of Russia, but more importantly risks jeopardising the integrity of the organisation.

It may also have served as revenge against Mozhin for his non-cooperation last year when IMF managing director Kristalina Georgieva was accused of manipulating data on behalf of China during her time at the World Bank.

The US has sought to strip Russia of the opportunity to convert its US$17 billion in special drawing rights – a form of reserve asset issued by the IMF – to hard currencies, a legitimate right of any IMF member state under the organisation’s charter.

Washington has also led a sustained push to remove “most-favoured nation” status for Russia at the World Trade Organization, the bedrock of the world trading system. It has done so by citing the WTO’s national security clause, which is difficult to prove and applies only when members’ own national security is threatened.

Advertisement

Some in the US Congress have even proposed moves to suspend Russia’s WTO membership. This might not be lawful, as the WTO rules appear silent on membership suspension.

Advertisement