Advertisement
Plant-based meatballs by Zhenmeat displayed at a Hope Tree restaurant in Beijing on September 4, 2020. How seriously China takes alternative meat will determine the country’s contribution to the international biodiversity agenda. Photo: Reuters

If we want to solve the biodiversity crisis, investing in alternative meats is arguably the scientifically most efficient solution. In this context, China is both a source of the problem and a key part of the solution: it is the world’s second-biggest meat market and an important driver in making alternative meat mainstream.

Advertisement
However, researchers and financiers across the world, including in China, fail to recognise the potential, and instead continue to prioritise inefficient investment in conservation. This miscalculation risks derailing global biodiversity efforts as we approach the UN Biodiversity Conference, to be held in Kunming, China, from October 11.

The scientific argument for alternative meat is increasingly solid. Simply put, people’s habit of eating meat threatens biodiversity. For example, the livestock industry requires about 30 per cent of ice-free land on the planet and 80 per cent of all agricultural area, being the main cause of 70 per cent of the world’s deforestation.

As the primary driver of habitat loss, meat consumption is estimated to be the leading cause of biodiversity loss. We see the same in the oceans, where the fishing industry has driven a marine biodiversity decline over the past 50 years.

Given these facts, shifting our diet towards alternative meats is the most direct solution to the biodiversity crisis as it tackles the main source of biodiversity loss.

01:53

One million plants and animals on brink of extinction, threatening economies and livelihoods across the world

One million plants and animals on brink of extinction, threatening economies and livelihoods across the world

But as developing countries get richer, the demand for animal products is expected to more than double by 2030. If this demand is met by conventional meat, we will simply lose the battle for biodiversity. Simultaneously, expecting developed and developing nations to stop eating meat altogether is unrealistic.

Advertisement