Opinion | How long can Hong Kong courts resist the pressure to act more like those on the mainland?
- Hong Kong’s courts are still clinging to their commitment to the rule of law and their role in assuring protection of individual rights against arbitrary state action, but the future is bleak
No two legal systems could be more different than Hong Kong’s common law system, inherited from British colonialism, and China’s Leninist communist system, imported from Joseph Stalin’s Soviet Union.
Mainland courts, while operating under a system that claims to be implementing “a socialist rule of law with Chinese characteristics”, are actually following Marxist theory and Soviet practice by placing law under government and the Communist Party, and serving as instruments of dictatorial control and repression of individual rights.
In practice, the party is far more important than the constitution and other elements of the law, although formally there is no contradiction since the law turns out to be what the party’s interpretations say it is.
Structurally, the Chinese legal system reflects the West European continental legal system’s influences upon the pre-1917 tsarist system that Vladimir Lenin adapted with socialist flourishes after the Bolshevik Revolution settled down in the early 1920s.