Opinion | Time for Hongkongers eligible for BN(O) visa scheme to choose where their loyalties lie
- With the city at its most critical juncture since 1997, those eligible for a BN(O) visa must decide between China’s vision for Hong Kong or a society where freedom of expression, police accountability, the rule of law and universal suffrage flourish
As soon as she said she was from China, and I Hong Kong, she asked me a question in Mandarin that had contributed to years of discontent and one year of social unrest in Hong Kong that culminated in Beijing’s imposition of a national security law for the city on June 30 – is Hong Kong not part of China?
In its judgment in the Nottebohm case in 1955, the International Court of Justice noted that, under international law, a state is generally free to determine the criteria and conditions for entry, residence and citizenship.
Under Article 1 of the 1930 Convention on Certain Questions Relating to the Conflict of Nationality Laws, the nationality law of a state “shall be recognised by other states in so far as it is consistent with international conventions, international custom and the principles of law generally recognised with regard to nationality”.
The issue of Hong Kong nationality was settled through the 1984 Sino-British Joint Declaration. That included an exchange of memoranda, in which Britain agreed not to extend Hongkongers British citizenship, and a series of British and Chinese legislative acts in preparation for the return of Hong Kong to China’s sovereignty on July 1, 1997.