Advertisement
Opinion | Why Hong Kong should not give up on democratic elections despite disqualification of lawmakers
- Although the disqualification of four lawmakers has called into question whether pro-democracy candidates should contest elections any more, doing so still serves a purpose even when the odds are stacked against them
Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
99+
In response to Beijing’s resolution effectively disqualifying four democratic legislative councillors last month, the remaining lawmakers in the democratic camp resigned en masse in protest.
Advertisement
Beijing’s sudden move must have occurred because it was angered by democratic lawmakers’ tactics in the Legislative Council, which were stopping the Hong Kong government from passing laws as it pleased.
Therefore, Beijing threw a tantrum by moving to exercise complete control over Hong Kong’s internal affairs, showing the world how “two systems” virtually exists in name only, and that “one country, two systems” is all but dead.
After our resignation en masse, society proceeded to discuss whether the democratic camp should still run for Legco seats in the future. To approach this question, we need to thoroughly consider the meaning of elections under an authoritarian rule.
04:08
Hong Kong opposition lawmakers to resign en masse over Legislative Council disqualifications
Hong Kong opposition lawmakers to resign en masse over Legislative Council disqualifications
The significance of elections is twofold. First, elections are a means for the public to express their opinions and are thus a major component of democracy. Elections mobilise the public to participate in democratic activities and enable them to realise the value and importance of the democratic system.
Advertisement
Advertisement