Opinion | At 75, is the United Nations still relevant or necessary?
- Legitimate criticism and lingering questions surround the UN, even as it makes important progress in areas mostly unseen and vastly under-reported
- Instead of using the UN as a scapegoat for political failures, criticism should be turned on to states that overpromise and underfund humanitarian operations
On September 21, the United Nations will celebrate its 75th birthday. Founded in 1945 after 50 countries met in San Francisco to draw up the UN Charter, it was conceived as an international institution that would “save succeeding generations from the scourge of war”.
Since then, it has evolved into an organisation of great size and complexity that confronts a wide array of challenges. However, legitimate criticism and lingering questions remain about its future. Is it still relevant? Is it still fit for purpose? Is it still necessary?
It famously failed Rwanda in 1994, refusing on multiple occasions to recognise that a genocide against the Tutsi minority was taking place and failed to alter the peacekeeping mission to protect innocent Rwandans. Today, the Security Council has failed in Syria, where 500,000 are dead, 5.5 million are refugees and more than 6.6 million are internally displaced.
02:35
UN’s food relief agency in urgent need for funds to keep coronavirus aid flights going
Peacekeeping missions remain under-resourced, famously displayed in Rwanda where 2,548 peacekeepers were reduced to a mere 270 to protect hundreds of thousands of innocent people. Peacekeepers today often lack proper technical support, capacity and other resources.