Advertisement

Opinion | Partial truths in US commission report on Hong Kong protests show propaganda at its most harmful

  • Through its filter of political bias, the US government agency draws dire conclusions about Hong Kong’s rule of law and alleges police brutality without evidence
  • Its accusation of a Chinese propaganda and disinformation campaign is hypocritical at best

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
Protesters calling for electoral reforms in Hong Kong gather for a rally on January 19. Hong Kong has, for the past seven months, been embroiled in protests sparked by opposition to an extradition bill. Photo: AP
They say half-truths are the worst lies. A case in point may be the latest report on China issued by the US Congressional-Executive Commission on China. In this report, there is a chapter on Hong Kong and Macau where the commission made at least three “findings” in relation to the recent events in Hong Kong.
Advertisement

The commission found that: firstly, there is “further erosion of Hong Kong’s autonomy and fundamental freedoms under the ‘one country, two systems’ framework” by reason of the proposed amendment to the extradition law; secondly, the Hong Kong police had used “excessive force and inappropriately operated crowd-control equipment”; and thirdly, the Chinese government had “employed propaganda, disinformation and censorship in an apparent attempt to shape reporting on the Hong Kong protests”.

The key accusation here, of course, is that Hong Kong’s autonomy and fundamental freedoms under “one country, two systems” have been further eroded.

It is instructive to examine both the accusation and the alleged reasons or evidence in support thereof, to see how far such an accusation bears scrutiny – if at all.

First, how could an amendment to an existing law “erode” Hong Kong’s constitutional system or the freedoms it protected? The report did not mention that the existing extradition law was enacted by the British colonial government before Hong Kong’s handover and contained all the human rights safeguards common to most common law jurisdictions. Nor did it note that the amendment was fashioned after the model treaty issued by the United Nations.
Advertisement
Advertisement