Advertisement

Editorial | Dark chapter in Hong Kong’s history finally closed

  • The lessons to be learned from Rafael Hui’s jailing and other high-profile cases can help ensure that nothing similar ever again stains the city’s conduct of its own affairs at the highest level

Reading Time:2 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
Rafael Hui walks out of Stanley Prison after serving five years for accepting bribes and inducements. Photo: Nora Tam
One of Hong Kong’s most sensational trials culminated two years ago in the rejection by the top court of appeals against corruption convictions by former chief secretary Rafael Hui Si-yan and former Sun Hung Kai Properties tycoon Thomas Kwok Ping-kwong. In a final footnote last week, Hui walked out of jail after serving five years of a 71/2 year sentence, just nine months after Kwok walked free.
Advertisement
Also this year, coincidentally, Donald Tsang Yam-kuen, the former chief executive who nominated Hui as his No. 2, had his conviction for misconduct in public office in a separate matter overturned on legal argument by the top court, but not before he had served a prison term. 

With Hui’s release a dark chapter in the city’s history is finally closed. The lessons to be learned from it can help ensure that nothing like it ever again stains the city’s conduct of its own affairs at the highest level under “one country, two systems”.

Hui was sentenced with Kwok and two middlemen for accepting nearly HK$20 million in total for looking out for SHKP’s interests. Hui, granted early release for good behaviour, and Kwok have paid their debts to society. But the case should never be forgotten for having underlined a defining principle of Hong Kong’s legal system – that everyone is treated equally before the law, including the rich and powerful.

The rejection of their appeals was seen to uphold the principle. At the heart of the appeal was a payment of HK$8.5 million by Kwok to Hui, via two middlemen who have since served lesser jail terms, before Hui became chief secretary in 2005. Prosecutors failed to identify any act by Hui in return for the money. But the court said he took the cash in return for his “favourable disposition” towards Sun Hung Kai while in office and that such a bargain was corrupt.

Advertisement
Advertisement