Advertisement

Opinion | Hong Kong’s wayward young protesters need taking in hand – by parents, professors and politicians

  • In the city’s darkest hour, its elders must exert their moral authority. Parents must rein in their children, educators must teach that violence is wrong and politicians must step up and shape Hong Kong’s future

Reading Time:4 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
Youngsters at the “Protect Children’s Future” rally in Hong Kong on August 10. Half a million students with a grouse come packaged with a million parents. Photo: May Tse
Given the escalating chaos on the streets of Hong Kong, it is an understatement to say the rule of law is under stress. Having caused “unforgivable havoc”, Chief Executive Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor and her ill-starred government continue to muddle from one dreadful miscalculation to another.
Advertisement
The October 1 celebration of the 70th anniversary of communist rule in China provided a logical watershed for a change in tack. This was the big protest crescendo, after which common sense would surely return. Or so conventional wisdom averred. But something would have to give.
Having braved the storm, Lam could have done the right thing and offered her resignation with key secretaries – responsible for the crisis – following suit. (She could still do this but has chosen to surrender the city’s “high degree of autonomy” to Beijing handlers. This is not how the Basic Law envisaged the functioning of government.)
With a clean slate, a new interim team in place, and a fresh chief executive election set in motion, there would have been a potential listener in the administration. The government instead doubled down with an iron fist and a miscued anti-mask emergency decree.
Citizens need to start local dialogues, not as vigilantes, but as visionary leaders acting in concert
Lam’s unfathomable mix of coy contrition and callous contrarianism has sent out all the wrong signals, at once offering student protesters a free pass for further arson and anarchy while rendering policing all but impossible. That “unforgivable havoc” has simply multiplied, casting doubt on the sincerity of the initial utterance.
Advertisement