Look at waste-to-energy option
The protests over the proposed landfill expansions have further highlighted the need for an independent review of Hong Kong's waste management plan.
The protests over the proposed landfill expansions have further highlighted the need for an independent review of Hong Kong's waste management plan.
The government has recognised the problem, but is not able to present a convincing solution. Its solution, proposed by the last administration, and simply regurgitated by the current one, lacks any credibility and that is why an independent review is necessary.
The waste problem is for everybody in Hong Kong to solve. Any solution that seeks to dump the problem on one sector of the community or in one area is flawed.
Why should Tseung Kwan O residents accept one-third of Hong Kong's total refuse? Why should South Lantau became the new dumping ground just because officials believe the small population will protest less than Tseung Kwan O or Tuen Mun residents?
A waste management policy should not be driven by short- term thinking or by adopting the line of least resistance.
The long-term goal must be to remove the existing landfill nuisance. This is possible over time as landfill waste can be used as fuel for modern waste-to-energy facilities. An independent review and an honest public debate will determine whether modern waste-to-energy incinerators are a health hazard. Technology has progressed a long way in recent years but the failure of government to convince Hong Kong people on this issue has resulted in stalemate - who should we believe?