Advertisement

Opinion | Lee Cheuk-yan’s by-election defeat is a wake-up call for Hong Kong’s pro-democracy camp

  • Albert Cheung says Hong Kong’s pro-democrats need to come back down to earth, and the grass roots, if they are to have any hope of keeping their seats in the upcoming elections and regaining their veto power

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
Pro-democrats Lee Cheuk-yan (left) and Frederick Fung (centre) lost the Kowloon West by-election to the pro-establishment Chan Hoi-yan (right). Photo: Sam Tsang
Pro-democracy candidate Lee Cheuk-yan lost the Kowloon West legislative by-election and the opposition failed to regain the veto power in the Legislative Council (Legco). His main rival, the pro-establishment Chan Hoi-yan, got 106,457 votes, beating Lee’s 93,047 votes by more than 13,000.
Advertisement
The second runner-up was spoiler candidate Frederick Fung Kin-kee, with 12,509 votes. Some critics suggest Lee never stood a chance and would have lost even if pro-democrat Fung had not joined the race. However, considering the numbers, if Fung had stayed out of the contest and canvassed for the pan-democracy camp, it could have won.

Still, there are plenty of reasons for the defeat. This is the second time in eight months the pan-democracy camp has lost a by-election. The days of the so-called 6:4 golden ratio – when the pro-democrats always captured 60 per cent of the votes, versus the pro-establishment parties’ 40 per cent – are basically over. If the pro-democrats persist with their outdated visions and do not face reality, they are likely to suffer an even more brutal defeat in the upcoming District Council and Legco elections.

The pan-democracy camp rose from the ashes of the June 4 incident in 1989. In the following 20 years, pan-democrats ran in single-seat elections on a single platform – anti-communism.

But in the 2012 Legislative Council election, the magic of the golden ratio started to fade. Localism was rising and the pan-democracy camp took fewer than 60 per cent of the votes, even though it still had more support than the pro-establishment parties. But by then, the public was voting for the pro-democrats – some of whom were underperforming or not performing at all – simply because they wanted to retain the camp’s critical veto power in the legislature.

Advertisement
It is not that the pro-democrats have not re-evaluated their strategy after Edward Yiu Chung-yim’s defeat in the March by-election. But they have failed to refine their vision and disappointed many voters. Between the last by-election and this, the pro-establishment camp has not actually gained more support; clearly, the pan-democracy camp has lost again because its disappointed supporters have abandoned it.
Advertisement