Advertisement

From North Korea to Iran and the trade war with China, rival countries have started calling Trump’s bluff

  • Donald Trump got elected promising he could solve disputes in the US’ favour without repeating the Iraq mistake or sacrificing the economy. One by one, other countries have realised he does not have a backup plan when the bluffing fails

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
Demonstrators tug at a mask of President Donald Trump at an anti-US rally in Iran on May 10. Whether it is Iran, North Korea, Venezuela or China, Trump has failed to solve the knottiest US foreign policy dilemmas with the sheer force of his deal-making savvy or charisma. Photo: EPA-EFE

Politicians the world over make contradictory promises, but few have had their contradictions exposed as plainly as US President Donald Trump. From North Korea to Venezuela, Iran and now China, 2019 has been distinctly unkind to Trump’s promises from 2016.

Advertisement

In the 2016 election, Trump capitalised on Americans’ frustrations with the US’ relative decline and Barack Obama’s more deliberate responses to foreign policy issues by promising he would make the US respected and, if necessary, feared again.

Less well remembered is that Trump just as savagely attacked the last Republican president, George W. Bush, and his decision to commit the US to an open-ended conflict in Iraq. This helped Trump build an unusual coalition of hawks who felt Obama was not tough enough, and doves who wanted fewer foreign entanglements.

But when one puts these two planks – toughness, but without war – together, a problematic assumption is revealed. Namely that Trump – either through deal-making savvy, charisma or a fearsome bluff – could resolve the knottiest US foreign policy dilemmas without force. And Trump’s business acumen and bold words have so far failed at convincing rival countries to abandon their own interests to accommodate the US’.

First, North Korea. No US administration has accepted Pyongyang as a nuclear state, but Trump’s has protested against its proliferation most loudly. Between threatening total destruction, insulting the leader of the North personally and stacking his cabinet with advisers who spoke ominous words about a coming reckoning, Trump worried North Korea-watching academics and policy wonks in 2017 and 2018 who feared he did not understand the consequences of a new Korean conflict.
What they may have missed is that Trump has, on more than one occasion, shown he does indeed understand the ramifications – saying after the Singapore summit that a deal has to be reached to keep South Korea’s capital out of danger, and claiming his election prevented war. It was therefore natural that, once the North signalled an openness, he would assume his opportunity to flex his deal-making skills had arrived.
Advertisement
Advertisement