bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

articlePageQuery

filter

article

articleBaseAdvertisingInfoArticle

articleListArticle

articleSeoArticle

helpersCheckIsPostiesArticle

hooksArticleAcknowledgementGateOverlayArticle

hooksTrackPageViewArticle

hooksContentInterestArticle

articleLinkingDataContent

articleSchemaContent

liveArticle

advertZone

sentiment

contentLock

topics

types

sections

moreOnThisArticles

urlAlias

commentCount

sponsorType

authorLocations

authors

paywallTypes

corrections

displaySlideShow

multimediaEmbed

printHeadline

seriesContainer

socialHeadline

headline

flag

firstTopic

glossary

flattenTypeIds

publishedDate

additionalInfoBoxes

images

image

relatedLinks

relatedNewsletters

__typename

createdDate

sponsor

factSheets

series

disableOffPlatformContent

published

updatedDate

summary

subHeadline

body

keywords

copyrighted

customTimezone

liveContents

Alex Lo

Chief Executive Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor and her finance chief like to advertise their latest budget as a model of generosity, a departure from the previous miserly administrations. A new study by the independent Legislative Council’s research unit seems to show otherwise.
The headline jump on education spending seems spectacular, an increase of 28.4 per cent, or HK$25.2 billion, to HK$113.7 billion. But that’s a one-off.
In fact, education as a share of total government spending has dropped from 22.9 per cent in 2007-2008 to 20.4 per cent in 2018-2019. 
Hong Kong budget giveaways offer no solutions for the city’s ills
The decline is even greater in terms of recurrent education spending from 23.5 per cent to 20.8 per cent during the same period. So much for saying our children are the future.


When it comes to social welfare, it’s undeniable that Lam’s predecessor Leung Chun-ying has greatly increased overall spending, a rising trend that Lam is continuing.
Demographic time bomb? Is Hong Kong spending enough to cope with greying population?
However, spending on elderly service as a share of recurrent welfare expenditure levelled out at 10.7 per cent in 2011-2012 and has remained at roughly 11 per cent ever since.
This is strange, considering the government has used the ageing population as an excuse to justify everything from the need to hold on to its large reserve to setting aside funds for no particular use other than for “a rainy day”.


More than one in 10 of those infrastructure projects costing HK$1 billion or more have had a cost overrun, ranging from 22 per cent to 196 per cent. 
Among these are: Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macau bridge (26 per cent), Kai Tak district cooling system (196 per cent), Guangzhou-Hong Kong express rail (29 per cent). 
Meanwhile, the government’s policy on welfare for the well-off continues apace. 


According to a previous study by the same Legco unit, for much of his tenure, former finance chief John Tsang Chun-wah’s budget giveaways and handouts mostly benefited the propertied class: 28.7 per cent went to property owners and 23.5 per cent to taxpayers; only 3.9 per cent to low-income families and another 7.6 per cent to other disadvantaged groups.
Why Paul Chan’s rethink on budget handouts does not set good precedent
Under the latest budget, the top 10 landlords – who own about 40,000 property units between them – will get rates waivers of more than HK$256 million.
The new budget philosophy looks a lot like the old one.


Trump machine gun has the US enemy No 1 China in crosshairs

With Trump, it’s payback time for Taiwan’s chips industry

Can America and China both become great again without clashing?

Western values, what Western values?

My Take

Hong Kong budget philosophy offers very little change

Education looks likes it's getting a budget increase of 28.4 per cent, from HK$25.2 billion to HK$113.7 billion. But as a share of the total government spending, the budget dropped from 22.9 per cent in 2007-2008 to 20.4 per cent in 2018-2019. Photo: Pool

Opinion

Comment

A study has revealed spending on infrastructure projects and the welfare of the well-off continues apace despite claims that those in need will benefit   


Hong Kong Budget 2018-2019

Ageing society

Expresses the views, ideas and conclusions of the author. (Eg. Enough of Crazy Rich Asians, think of crazy poor Hongkongers.)


Column

My Take | Hong Kong budget philosophy offers very little change

A study has revealed spending on infrastructure projects and the welfare of the well-off continues apace despite claims that those in need will benefit

Demographic time bomb? Is Hong Kong spending enough to cope with greying population?