Advertisement

Just Saying | If you don’t like it here, get out: why Hong Kong’s downtrodden domestic helpers can never win

Yonden Lhatoo asks what hope there is for this marginalised but vital sector when, instead of addressing their grievances, we argue they are welcome to leave if life here is unbearable

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
Foreign domestic helpers in Hong Kong have a long history of campaigning for improved working conditions in the city. Photo: Reuters

“If you don’t like it here, you can always leave, go back to where you came from,” is a regular refrain in Hong Kong to discourage the less fortunate among us from speaking out about their plight.

Advertisement

It has to be the most defeatist argument in defence of existing ills in society and the biggest impediment to progress, this boneheaded belief that only a bona fide son of the soil has the right to complain and anyone else should either just suck it up or go away.

Which is why it’s so disheartening to see a High Court judge, no less, offering the equivalent of this interpretation in the first judicial review of the government rule that forces Hong Kong’s 370,000 foreign domestic helpers to live with the families who hire them.
The foreign domestic helper community in Hong Kong numbers 370,000 people, mostly women from Indonesia and the Philippines. Photo: David Wong
The foreign domestic helper community in Hong Kong numbers 370,000 people, mostly women from Indonesia and the Philippines. Photo: David Wong
It was a landmark test case that held out hope to countless women who have to put up with slave-like working and living conditions, but the judge threw out the argument that the live-in rule was unconstitutional.
Advertisement

“It cannot seriously be argued that the imposition of the live-in requirement would directly constitute, or give rise to, a violation of the [foreign domestic helper’s] fundamental rights,” he said. “If, after coming to work in Hong Kong, the foreign domestic helper finds it unacceptable, for any reason, to reside in his/her employer’s residence, it is well within his/her right or power to terminate the employment.”

Advertisement