Advertisement

South Korea’s new president must hit the ground running to deal with North Korea

John Barry Kotch say the just-elected liberal Moon Jae-in would do well to take the lead diplomatically on resolving the stand-off over North Korea, but getting China and the US on the same page won’t be easy

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
South Korean President Moon Jae-in speaks to his aides while walking to his office building at the Blue House presidential compound in Seoul. Photo: EPA

South Koreans could be forgiven for feeling a little like Mexicans, whose unkind fate has landed them “so far from God and so close to the United States”. For Koreans, a self-described “shrimp among whales” and prone to being crushed in the game of Great Power rivalry, the situation is much more complicated and the necessity for balance and nuance in policy terms much greater.

Advertisement

While economic security resides increasingly with China, its largest trading partner, national security with the US, its protector of last resort, and with a historical legacy shadowed by Japan, its overriding preoccupation is with fending off its nuclear nemesis to the north.

Phone diplomacy: South Korean leader Moon Jae-in speaks with Abe, Xi and Trump

In last week’s changing of the guard in Seoul, the moderate liberal candidate, Moon Jae-in, convincingly defeated his two rivals in a three-man race to replace disgraced former conservative president, Park Geun-hye, constituting a bellwether for all three; improving relations with the North, repairing relations with Beijing while maintaining a strong alliance with Washington.

The last four South Korean administrations reflected starkly different outlooks. The first two, presided over by Kim Dae-jung and his successor, Roh Moo-hyun, spanning the years 1998-2008, hewed to the “sunshine policy of engagement” with the North, featuring two summits, family exchanges, tourism and the establishment of the Kaesong economic zone. This worked well during the Clinton administration, but ran into headwinds after 2000 with the election of George W. Bush, who labelled Kim Jong-il a “pygmy” leader who “starves his people”, consigning the North Korean regime to membership in the “axis of evil”.

By contrast, the last two administrations (2009-2017) led by conservatives, Lee Myung-baek and the recently impeached Park Geun-hye, took a hard line, not out of sync with the Obama administration’s policy of “strategic patience”. By now, the gains of the Kim and Roh years have become a distant memory.

Advertisement
North Korean ambassador to China Ji Jae-ryong leaves a room after giving a press conference at the North Korean embassy in Beijing on Monday. Seoul’s likely pursuit of engagement will strengthen Beijing’s clout diplomatically with Pyongyang. Photo: AP
North Korean ambassador to China Ji Jae-ryong leaves a room after giving a press conference at the North Korean embassy in Beijing on Monday. Seoul’s likely pursuit of engagement will strengthen Beijing’s clout diplomatically with Pyongyang. Photo: AP

From North Korea to THAAD: What Moon Jae-in’s victory means for Seoul

Advertisement