Advertisement

Two children will be better than one for China’s economy

Keyu Jin says Beijing’s shift to a two-child policy will have far-reaching social effects but could also help put the economy on a more stable long-term growth path by boosting domestic consumption

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
Twin boys wave national flags in Beijing. Two-child families will create a surge in spending. Photo: Reuters

The announcement that China is terminating its one-child policy marks the end of a 37-year historical aberration that has accelerated the country’s demographic ageing by decades. The social and economic consequences of the drastic population controls, which reduced the average fertility rate in urban households from about three in 1970 to just over one by 1982, have been dramatic. The question now is whether, and to what extent, the country’s new two-child policy will mitigate those consequences.

READ MORE: China’s new two-child policy legislation formally comes into force

In fact, the impact of the two-child policy is likely to be just as far-reaching – and much more positive. This is especially true in the long term. A key reason is that an increase in the number of children per household will force a reduction in the aggregate savings rate, fulfilling a long-standing macroeconomic goal.

Advertisement
Newborn babies are given baths by a parent and nurses at a hospital in Wuhan. The impact of China’s two-child policy is likely to be just as far-reaching as that of the one-child policy – and much more positive. Photo: Reuters
Newborn babies are given baths by a parent and nurses at a hospital in Wuhan. The impact of China’s two-child policy is likely to be just as far-reaching as that of the one-child policy – and much more positive. Photo: Reuters
China’s current saving rate is so high it is often blamed for fuelling global imbalances. Moreover, it is a major obstacle in China’s transition from an export-led growth model to one based on domestic consumption and services. The two-child policy may prove indispensable in propelling this transition – a process that will begin sooner than most observers anticipate.
As retirees outnumber working-age people, the pressure on today’s younger generation will intensify

So far, economists have focused largely on the impending shifts in China’s demographic structure. Driven by the one-child policy, the share of China’s population under the age of 20 fell from 51 per cent in 1970 to 27 per cent by 2010, while the share of people aged 60 and up rose from 7 per cent to 14 per cent. As a result, the median age increased from about 20 to 35.

As retirees increasingly outnumber working-age people, the pressure on today’s younger generation will intensify. In the coming years, each member of the post-1980s one-child generation will need to support two older people, on average.

A girl walks with her parents on a street in Beijing. In the coming years, each member of the post-1980s one-child generation will need to support two older people, on average. Photo: Reuters
A girl walks with her parents on a street in Beijing. In the coming years, each member of the post-1980s one-child generation will need to support two older people, on average. Photo: Reuters
Of course, when the two-child generation becomes middle-aged, its members will each have to support only one elderly person, on average, alleviating the economic pressure associated with such a high old-age dependency ratio. But that will take a few decades. In the meantime, the post-1980s one-child generation will be supporting not only the elderly, but also a higher number of young people.
Advertisement

Although this will be tough on the one-child generation, an unintended side effect will be a surge in consumption, as its members will have little choice but to spend a lot more. A comparison of families that had twins under the one-child policy and those that had just one child offers an indication of the scale of the change (though the inability of twins’ parents to spread out consumption spending over time means that it is not a perfect representation). In terms of saving, urban households with two children saved 12.8 per cent of their incomes, on average, in 2009, compared to 21.3 per cent in families with an only child. The difference is large across all income groups.

Advertisement